From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com ([213.167.242.64]:38710 "EHLO perceval.ideasonboard.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731437AbeGZATZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2018 20:19:25 -0400 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: Hans de Goede , Carlos Garnacho , Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Re: Devices with a front and back webcam represented as a single UVC device Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 02:06:06 +0300 Message-ID: <10745005.DZ8nYEgB6R@avalon> In-Reply-To: References: <8804dcb3-1aca-3679-6a96-bbe554f188d0@redhat.com> <1762892.v9kic1zYKq@avalon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Javier, On Tuesday, 24 July 2018 15:35:17 EEST Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > [snip] > > >> Laurent, thank you for your input on this. I thought it was a bit weird > >> that the cam on my HP X2 only had what appears to be the debug controls, > >> so I opened it up and as I suspect (after your analysis) it is using a > >> USB module for the front camera, but the back camera is a sensor > >> directly hooked with its CSI/MIPI bus to the PCB, so very likely it is > >> using the ATOMISP stuff. > >> > >> So I think that we can consider this "solved" for my 2-in-1. > > > > Great, I'll add you to the list of potential testers for an ATOMISP > > solution :-) > > The ATOMISP driver was removed from staging by commit 51b8dc5163d > ("media: staging: atomisp: Remove driver"). Do you mean that there's a > plan to bring that driver back? I don't think so, unless someone is willing to invest the time it would need to bring it back. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart