From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from www.youplala.net ([88.191.51.216] helo=mail.youplala.net) by www.linuxtv.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JRlRy-00045W-Eq for linux-dvb@linuxtv.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:41:14 +0100 Received: from [134.32.138.158] (unknown [134.32.138.158]) by mail.youplala.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A7E3D8811B for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:39:59 +0100 (CET) From: Nicolas Will To: linux-dvb@linuxtv.org In-Reply-To: <1203499665.7026.66.camel@tux> References: <1203434275.6870.25.camel@tux> <1203499665.7026.66.camel@tux> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:39:59 +0000 Message-Id: <1203500399.6682.10.camel@acropora> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] [patch] support for key repeat with dib0700 ir receiver List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-dvb-bounces@linuxtv.org Errors-To: linux-dvb-bounces+mchehab=infradead.org@linuxtv.org List-ID: On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 10:27 +0100, Filippo Argiolas wrote: > So I think in the meanwhile my patch could be > merged (if you think it's good) waiting for this work to be done. I second that. I'm all for the greater good and Doing Things The Right Way (tm), but could this effort be spawned in a separate process for grander things? > I'll take a deeper look at the code but I don't know if I'm able to do > this thing, I've read kernel code a few days ago for the very first > time > and I've written the patch just because a I needed the repeat > feature :) Scratched an itch, heh? ;o) Nico _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb