From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 00/21] Make use of kref in media device, grab references as needed
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 20:13:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <123545704.YXsQANS9kg@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ea29010f-ffdc-f10f-8b4f-fb1337320863@osg.samsung.com>
Hi Shuah,
On Thursday 15 Dec 2016 09:06:41 Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 12/15/2016 08:26 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On 15/12/16 15:45, Shuah Khan wrote:
> >> On 12/15/2016 07:03 AM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >>> On 15/12/16 13:56, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>>> On Thursday 15 Dec 2016 13:30:41 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 10:24:47AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >>>>>> Em Tue, 13 Dec 2016 12:53:05 +0200 Sakari Ailus escreveu:
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 09:13:05AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
wrote:
[snip]
> >>> In my view the main problem is that the media core is bound to a struct
> >>> device set by the driver that creates the MC. But since the MC gives an
> >>> overview of lots of other (sub)devices the refcount of the media device
> >>> should be increased for any (sub)device that adds itself to the MC and
> >>> decreased for any (sub)device that is removed. Only when the very last
> >>> user goes away can the MC memory be released.
> >>
> >> Correct. Media Device Allocator API work I did allows creating media
> >> device on parent USB device to allow media sound driver share the media
> >> device. It does ref-counting on media device and media device is
> >> unregistered only when the last driver unregisters it.
> >>
> >> There is another aspect to explore regarding media device and the graph.
> >>
> >> Should all the entities stick around until all references to media
> >> device are gone? If an application has /dev/media open, does that
> >> mean all entities should not be free'd until this app. exits? What
> >> should happen if an app. is streaming? Should the graph stay intact
> >> until the app. exits?
> >
> > Yes, everything must stay around until the last user has disappeared.
> >
> > In general unplugs can happen at any time. So applications can be in the
> > middle of an ioctl, and removing memory during that time is just
> > impossible.
> >
> > On unplug you:
> >
> > 1) stop any HW DMA (highly device dependent)
> > 2) wake up any filehandles that wait for an event
> > 3) unregister any device nodes
> >
> > Then just sit back and wait for refcounts to go down as filehandles are
> > closed by the application.
> >
> > Note: the v4l2/media/cec/IR/whatever core is typically responsible for
> > rejecting any ioctls/mmap/etc. once the device node has been
> > unregistered. The only valid file operation is release().
> >
> >> If yes, this would pose problems when we have multiple drivers bound
> >> to the media device. When audio driver goes away for example, it
> >> should
> >> be allowed to delete its entities.
> >
> > Only if you can safely remove it from the topology data structures while
> > being 100% certain that nobody can ever access it. I'm not sure if that is
> > the case. Actually, looking at e.g. adv7604.c it does
> > media_entity_cleanup(&sd->entity); in remove() which is an empty
> > function, so there doesn't appear any attempt to safely clean up an
> > entity (i.e. make sure no running media ioctl can access it or call ops).
>
> Right. media_entity_cleanup() nothing at the moment. Also if it gets called
> after media_device_unregister_entity(), it could pose problems. I wonder if
> we have drivers that are calling media_entity_cleanup() after unregistering
> the entity?
>
> > This probably will need to be serialized with the graph_mutex lock.
> >
> >> The approach current mc-core takes is that the media_device and
> >> media_devnode stick around, but entities can be added and removed during
> >> media_device lifetime.
> >
> > Seems reasonable. But the removal needs to be done carefully, and that
> > doesn't seem to be the case now (unless adv7604.c is just buggy).
>
> Correct. It is possible media_device is embedded in this driver.
I assume you mean the private data structure instantiated by the adv7604
driver. That can't be the case, as adv7604 is a subdev.
> When driver that embeds is unbound, media_device goes away. I needed to make
> the media device refcounted and sharable for audio work and that is what the
> Media Device Allocator API does.
>
> Maybe we have more cases than this audio case that requires media_device
> refcounted. If we have to keep entities that are in use until all the
> references go away, we have to ref-count them as well.
I think we're converging towards refcounting media_device to manage its
lifetime, so there's more cases, yes. That's why I propose first making
media_device refcounted, and then adding the allocator API on top of that
given that the allocator API requires refcounting. That seems to me to be the
cleanest approach.
> >> If an app. is still running when media_device is unregistered,
> >> media_device isn't released until the last reference goes away and ioctls
> >> can check if media_device is registered or not.
> >>
> >> We have to decide on the larger lifetime question surrounding
> >> media_device and graph as well.
> >
> > I don't think there is any choice but to keep it all alive until the last
> > reference goes away.
>
> If you mean "all alive" entities as well, we have to ref-count them. Because
> drivers can unregister entities during run-time now. I am looking at the
> use-case where, a driver that has dvb and video and what should happen when
> dvb is unbound for example. Should dvb entities go away or should they stay
> until all the drivers are unbound?
I believe they'll have to stay until they're not referenced anymore, which
could (and likely should) be earlier than the the other drivers are unbound.
> v4l2-core registers and unregisters entities and so does dvb-core. So when a
> driver unregisters video and dvb, these entities get deleted.
Not if we refcount entities, deletion won't be synchronous with unregistration
in that case.
> So we have a distributed mode of registering and unregistering entities. We
> also have ioctls (video, dvb, and media) accessing these entities. So where
> do we make changes to ensure entities stick around until all users exit?
>
> Ref-counting entities won't work if they are embedded - like in the case of
> struct video_device which embeds the media entity. When struct video goes
> away then entity will disappear.
Why is that ? If the entity is referenced it should certainly prevent
video_device from disappearing.
> So we do have a complex lifetime model here that we need to figure out how
> to fix.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-23 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-26 23:43 [RFC v3 00/21] Make use of kref in media device, grab references as needed Sakari Ailus
2016-08-26 23:43 ` [RFC v3 01/21] Revert "[media] media: fix media devnode ioctl/syscall and unregister race" Sakari Ailus
2016-08-26 23:43 ` [RFC v3 02/21] Revert "[media] media: fix use-after-free in cdev_put() when app exits after driver unbind" Sakari Ailus
2016-08-26 23:43 ` [RFC v3 03/21] Revert "[media] media-device: dynamically allocate struct media_devnode" Sakari Ailus
2016-08-26 23:43 ` [RFC v3 04/21] media: Remove useless curly braces and parentheses Sakari Ailus
2016-08-26 23:43 ` [RFC v3 05/21] media: devnode: Rename mdev argument as devnode Sakari Ailus
2016-08-26 23:43 ` [RFC v3 06/21] media device: Drop nop release callback Sakari Ailus
2016-08-26 23:43 ` [RFC v3 07/21] media-device: Make devnode.dev->kobj parent of devnode.cdev Sakari Ailus
2016-08-26 23:43 ` [RFC v3 08/21] media: Enable allocating the media device dynamically Sakari Ailus
2016-08-26 23:43 ` [RFC v3 09/21] media: Split initialising and adding media devnode Sakari Ailus
2016-08-26 23:43 ` [RFC v3 10/21] media: Shuffle functions around Sakari Ailus
2016-08-26 23:43 ` [RFC v3 11/21] media device: Refcount the media device Sakari Ailus
2016-08-26 23:43 ` [RFC v3 12/21] media device: Initialise media devnode in media_device_init() Sakari Ailus
2016-08-26 23:43 ` [RFC v3 13/21] media device: Deprecate media_device_{init,cleanup}() for drivers Sakari Ailus
2016-08-26 23:43 ` [RFC v3 14/21] media device: Get the media device driver's device Sakari Ailus
2016-08-26 23:43 ` [RFC v3 15/21] media: Provide a way to the driver to set a private pointer Sakari Ailus
2016-08-26 23:43 ` [RFC v3 16/21] media: Add release callback for media device Sakari Ailus
2016-08-26 23:43 ` [RFC v3 17/21] v4l: Acquire a reference to the media device for every video device Sakari Ailus
2016-08-26 23:43 ` [RFC v3 18/21] media-device: Postpone graph object removal until free Sakari Ailus
2016-08-26 23:43 ` [RFC v3 19/21] omap3isp: Allocate the media device dynamically Sakari Ailus
2016-08-26 23:43 ` [RFC v3 20/21] omap3isp: Release the isp device struct by media device callback Sakari Ailus
2016-08-26 23:43 ` [RFC v3 21/21] omap3isp: Don't rely on devm for memory resource management Sakari Ailus
2016-12-15 11:23 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-15 11:39 ` Sakari Ailus
2016-12-15 11:42 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-15 11:45 ` Sakari Ailus
2016-12-15 11:57 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-15 19:17 ` Shuah Khan
2016-12-16 13:32 ` Sakari Ailus
2016-12-16 14:39 ` Shuah Khan
2016-11-07 20:16 ` [RFC v3 00/21] Make use of kref in media device, grab references as needed Shuah Khan
2016-11-08 8:19 ` Sakari Ailus
2016-11-09 16:49 ` Shuah Khan
2016-11-09 17:00 ` Shuah Khan
2016-11-09 17:46 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2016-11-14 13:27 ` Sakari Ailus
2016-11-22 17:44 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2016-11-22 18:13 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-11-22 18:41 ` Shuah Khan
2016-11-22 22:56 ` Shuah Khan
2016-11-28 10:45 ` Sakari Ailus
2016-11-29 11:13 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2016-12-13 10:53 ` Sakari Ailus
2016-12-13 12:24 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2016-12-13 22:23 ` Shuah Khan
2016-12-15 10:39 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-15 14:56 ` Shuah Khan
2016-12-16 16:58 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-15 11:30 ` Sakari Ailus
2016-12-15 12:56 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-15 14:03 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-12-15 14:32 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2016-12-15 14:45 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-12-15 15:45 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2016-12-15 16:07 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-12-16 16:47 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-16 16:43 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-15 14:45 ` Shuah Khan
2016-12-15 15:26 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-12-15 16:06 ` Shuah Khan
2016-12-15 16:28 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-12-15 17:09 ` Shuah Khan
2016-12-15 17:25 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2016-12-15 17:51 ` Shuah Khan
2016-12-16 10:11 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-12-16 10:57 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2016-12-16 11:27 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-12-16 12:00 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2016-12-16 14:45 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-12-19 9:28 ` Media summit in Feb? - Was: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2016-12-21 1:31 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2016-12-21 14:27 ` Shuah Khan
2016-12-22 17:47 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-22 20:43 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2016-12-16 10:03 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-12-16 10:12 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2016-12-23 18:13 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2016-12-15 17:08 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2016-12-23 17:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-23 17:48 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-23 17:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-16 15:07 ` Sakari Ailus
2016-12-16 16:34 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-12-19 9:46 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-01-02 7:53 ` Sakari Ailus
2017-01-24 10:49 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-01-25 11:02 ` Sakari Ailus
2017-01-26 9:10 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2017-05-30 23:41 ` Shuah Khan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=123545704.YXsQANS9kg@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@s-opensource.com \
--cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=shuahkh@osg.samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox