public inbox for linux-media@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexey Klimov <klimov.linux@gmail.com>
To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
	Douglas Schilling Landgraf <dougsland@gmail.com>
Subject: [question] about open/release and vidioc_g_input/vidioc_s_input functions
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:14:07 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1237850047.31041.162.camel@tux.localhost> (raw)

Hello, all

After last convertion of radio drivers to use v4l2_device we have such
code in many radio drivers:
(it's radio-terratec.c for example)

...
 static int terratec_open(struct file *file)
{
        return 0;
}

static int terratec_release(struct file *file)
{
        return 0;
}
...

and

...
static int vidioc_g_input(struct file *filp, void *priv, unsigned int
*i)
{
        *i = 0;
        return 0;
}

static int vidioc_s_input(struct file *filp, void *priv, unsigned int i)
{
        return i ? -EINVAL : 0;
}
...

Such code used in many radio-drivers as i understand.

Is it good to place this empty and almost empty functions in:
(here i see two variants)

1) In header file that be in linux/drivers/media/radio/ directory.
Later, we can move some generic/or repeating code in this header.

2) In any v4l header. What header may contain this ? 

?

For what ? Well, as i understand we can decrease amount of lines and
provide this simple generic functions. It's like
video_device_release_empty function behaviour. Maybe not only radio
drivers can use such vidioc_g_input and vidioc_s_input.

Is it worth ?

-- 
Best regards, Klimov Alexey


             reply	other threads:[~2009-03-23 23:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-23 23:14 Alexey Klimov [this message]
2009-03-24  7:06 ` [question] about open/release and vidioc_g_input/vidioc_s_input functions Hans Verkuil
2009-03-24  9:58   ` Laurent Pinchart
2009-03-27 16:44   ` Alexey Klimov
2009-03-27 16:50     ` Hans Verkuil
2009-03-27 17:34       ` Alexey Klimov
2009-03-27 17:45         ` Hans Verkuil
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-03-24 10:24 Hans Verkuil

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1237850047.31041.162.camel@tux.localhost \
    --to=klimov.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=dougsland@gmail.com \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox