[PATCH]V4L:some v4l drivers have error for video_register_device

[PATCH]V4L:some v4l drivers have error for video_register_device

[Figo.zhang]

For video_register_device(), it return zero means register success.It would be return zero
or a negative number (on failure),it would not return a positive number.so it have better to
use this to check err:
	int err = video_register_device(vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
	if (err != 0) {
		/*err code*/
	}

 
Signed-off-by: Figo.zhang <figo1802@gmail.com>
--- 
 Documentation/video4linux/v4l2-framework.txt |    2 +-
 drivers/media/radio/radio-maestro.c          |    2 +-
 drivers/media/radio/radio-si470x.c           |    2 +-
 drivers/media/video/cafe_ccic.c              |    2 +-
 drivers/media/video/cx231xx/cx231xx-video.c  |    2 +-
 drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-video.c    |    2 +-
 drivers/media/video/et61x251/et61x251_core.c |    2 +-
 drivers/media/video/hdpvr/hdpvr-video.c      |    2 +-
 drivers/media/video/ivtv/ivtv-streams.c      |    2 +-
 drivers/media/video/sn9c102/sn9c102_core.c   |    2 +-
 drivers/media/video/stk-webcam.c             |    2 +-
 drivers/media/video/w9968cf.c                |    2 +-
 drivers/media/video/zc0301/zc0301_core.c     |    2 +-
 drivers/media/video/zr364xx.c                |    2 +-
 sound/i2c/other/tea575x-tuner.c              |    2 +-
 15 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/video4linux/v4l2-framework.txt b/Documentation/video4linux/v4l2-framework.txt
index 854808b..250232a 100644
--- a/Documentation/video4linux/v4l2-framework.txt
+++ b/Documentation/video4linux/v4l2-framework.txt
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ Next you register the video device: this will create the character device
 for you.
 
 	err = video_register_device(vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
-	if (err) {
+	if (err != 0) {
 		video_device_release(vdev); /* or kfree(my_vdev); */
 		return err;
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/media/radio/radio-maestro.c b/drivers/media/radio/radio-maestro.c
index 64d737c..b5e93c2 100644
--- a/drivers/media/radio/radio-maestro.c
+++ b/drivers/media/radio/radio-maestro.c
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int __devinit maestro_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
 	video_set_drvdata(&dev->vdev, dev);
 
 	retval = video_register_device(&dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_RADIO, radio_nr);
-	if (retval) {
+	if (retval != 0) {
 		v4l2_err(v4l2_dev, "can't register video device!\n");
 		goto errfr1;
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/media/radio/radio-si470x.c b/drivers/media/radio/radio-si470x.c
index bd945d0..edb520a 100644
--- a/drivers/media/radio/radio-si470x.c
+++ b/drivers/media/radio/radio-si470x.c
@@ -1740,7 +1740,7 @@ static int si470x_usb_driver_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
 
 	/* register video device */
 	retval = video_register_device(radio->videodev, VFL_TYPE_RADIO, radio_nr);
-	if (retval) {
+	if (retval != 0) {
 		printk(KERN_WARNING DRIVER_NAME
 				": Could not register video device\n");
 		goto err_all;
diff --git a/drivers/media/video/cafe_ccic.c b/drivers/media/video/cafe_ccic.c
index c4d181d..fd93698 100644
--- a/drivers/media/video/cafe_ccic.c
+++ b/drivers/media/video/cafe_ccic.c
@@ -1974,7 +1974,7 @@ static int cafe_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
 /*	cam->vdev.debug = V4L2_DEBUG_IOCTL_ARG;*/
 	cam->vdev.v4l2_dev = &cam->v4l2_dev;
 	ret = video_register_device(&cam->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
-	if (ret)
+	if (ret != 0)
 		goto out_smbus;
 	video_set_drvdata(&cam->vdev, cam);
 
diff --git a/drivers/media/video/cx231xx/cx231xx-video.c b/drivers/media/video/cx231xx/cx231xx-video.c
index a23ae73..14e5008 100644
--- a/drivers/media/video/cx231xx/cx231xx-video.c
+++ b/drivers/media/video/cx231xx/cx231xx-video.c
@@ -2382,7 +2382,7 @@ int cx231xx_register_analog_devices(struct cx231xx *dev)
 	/* register v4l2 video video_device */
 	ret = video_register_device(dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER,
 				    video_nr[dev->devno]);
-	if (ret) {
+	if (ret != 0) {
 		cx231xx_errdev("unable to register video device (error=%i).\n",
 			       ret);
 		return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-video.c b/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-video.c
index 882796e..dcc3aca 100644
--- a/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-video.c
+++ b/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-video.c
@@ -2013,7 +2013,7 @@ int em28xx_register_analog_devices(struct em28xx *dev)
 	/* register v4l2 video video_device */
 	ret = video_register_device(dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER,
 				       video_nr[dev->devno]);
-	if (ret) {
+	if (ret != 0) {
 		em28xx_errdev("unable to register video device (error=%i).\n",
 			      ret);
 		return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/media/video/et61x251/et61x251_core.c b/drivers/media/video/et61x251/et61x251_core.c
index d1c1e45..8a767e1 100644
--- a/drivers/media/video/et61x251/et61x251_core.c
+++ b/drivers/media/video/et61x251/et61x251_core.c
@@ -2591,7 +2591,7 @@ et61x251_usb_probe(struct usb_interface* intf, const struct usb_device_id* id)
 
 	err = video_register_device(cam->v4ldev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER,
 				    video_nr[dev_nr]);
-	if (err) {
+	if (err != 0) {
 		DBG(1, "V4L2 device registration failed");
 		if (err == -ENFILE && video_nr[dev_nr] == -1)
 			DBG(1, "Free /dev/videoX node not found");
diff --git a/drivers/media/video/hdpvr/hdpvr-video.c b/drivers/media/video/hdpvr/hdpvr-video.c
index 3e6ffee..14c8488 100644
--- a/drivers/media/video/hdpvr/hdpvr-video.c
+++ b/drivers/media/video/hdpvr/hdpvr-video.c
@@ -1237,7 +1237,7 @@ int hdpvr_register_videodev(struct hdpvr_device *dev, struct device *parent,
 	dev->video_dev->parent = parent;
 	video_set_drvdata(dev->video_dev, dev);
 
-	if (video_register_device(dev->video_dev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, devnum)) {
+	if (video_register_device(dev->video_dev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, devnum) != 0) {
 		v4l2_err(&dev->v4l2_dev, "video_device registration failed\n");
 		goto error;
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/media/video/ivtv/ivtv-streams.c b/drivers/media/video/ivtv/ivtv-streams.c
index 15da017..1aca6b3 100644
--- a/drivers/media/video/ivtv/ivtv-streams.c
+++ b/drivers/media/video/ivtv/ivtv-streams.c
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static int ivtv_reg_dev(struct ivtv *itv, int type)
 	video_set_drvdata(s->vdev, s);
 
 	/* Register device. First try the desired minor, then any free one. */
-	if (video_register_device(s->vdev, vfl_type, num)) {
+	if (video_register_device(s->vdev, vfl_type, num) != 0) {
 		IVTV_ERR("Couldn't register v4l2 device for %s kernel number %d\n",
 				s->name, num);
 		video_device_release(s->vdev);
diff --git a/drivers/media/video/sn9c102/sn9c102_core.c b/drivers/media/video/sn9c102/sn9c102_core.c
index 23edfdc..55242c4 100644
--- a/drivers/media/video/sn9c102/sn9c102_core.c
+++ b/drivers/media/video/sn9c102/sn9c102_core.c
@@ -3334,7 +3334,7 @@ sn9c102_usb_probe(struct usb_interface* intf, const struct usb_device_id* id)
 
 	err = video_register_device(cam->v4ldev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER,
 				    video_nr[dev_nr]);
-	if (err) {
+	if (err != 0) {
 		DBG(1, "V4L2 device registration failed");
 		if (err == -ENFILE && video_nr[dev_nr] == -1)
 			DBG(1, "Free /dev/videoX node not found");
diff --git a/drivers/media/video/stk-webcam.c b/drivers/media/video/stk-webcam.c
index 1a6d39c..1a7aca0 100644
--- a/drivers/media/video/stk-webcam.c
+++ b/drivers/media/video/stk-webcam.c
@@ -1323,7 +1323,7 @@ static int stk_register_video_device(struct stk_camera *dev)
 	dev->vdev.debug = debug;
 	dev->vdev.parent = &dev->interface->dev;
 	err = video_register_device(&dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
-	if (err)
+	if (err != 0)
 		STK_ERROR("v4l registration failed\n");
 	else
 		STK_INFO("Syntek USB2.0 Camera is now controlling video device"
diff --git a/drivers/media/video/w9968cf.c b/drivers/media/video/w9968cf.c
index f59b2bd..5f56e90 100644
--- a/drivers/media/video/w9968cf.c
+++ b/drivers/media/video/w9968cf.c
@@ -3500,7 +3500,7 @@ w9968cf_usb_probe(struct usb_interface* intf, const struct usb_device_id* id)
 
 	err = video_register_device(cam->v4ldev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER,
 				    video_nr[dev_nr]);
-	if (err) {
+	if (err != 0) {
 		DBG(1, "V4L device registration failed")
 		if (err == -ENFILE && video_nr[dev_nr] == -1)
 			DBG(2, "Couldn't find a free /dev/videoX node")
diff --git a/drivers/media/video/zc0301/zc0301_core.c b/drivers/media/video/zc0301/zc0301_core.c
index 9697104..05296fc 100644
--- a/drivers/media/video/zc0301/zc0301_core.c
+++ b/drivers/media/video/zc0301/zc0301_core.c
@@ -1991,7 +1991,7 @@ zc0301_usb_probe(struct usb_interface* intf, const struct usb_device_id* id)
 
 	err = video_register_device(cam->v4ldev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER,
 				    video_nr[dev_nr]);
-	if (err) {
+	if (err != 0) {
 		DBG(1, "V4L2 device registration failed");
 		if (err == -ENFILE && video_nr[dev_nr] == -1)
 			DBG(1, "Free /dev/videoX node not found");
diff --git a/drivers/media/video/zr364xx.c b/drivers/media/video/zr364xx.c
index ac169c9..83d0aea 100644
--- a/drivers/media/video/zr364xx.c
+++ b/drivers/media/video/zr364xx.c
@@ -857,7 +857,7 @@ static int zr364xx_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
 	mutex_init(&cam->lock);
 
 	err = video_register_device(cam->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
-	if (err) {
+	if (err != 0) {
 		dev_err(&udev->dev, "video_register_device failed\n");
 		video_device_release(cam->vdev);
 		kfree(cam->buffer);
diff --git a/sound/i2c/other/tea575x-tuner.c b/sound/i2c/other/tea575x-tuner.c
index d31c373..27bc7be 100644
--- a/sound/i2c/other/tea575x-tuner.c
+++ b/sound/i2c/other/tea575x-tuner.c
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ void snd_tea575x_init(struct snd_tea575x *tea)
 
 	retval = video_register_device(tea575x_radio_inst,
 				       VFL_TYPE_RADIO, radio_nr);
-	if (retval) {
+	if (retval != 0) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "tea575x-tuner: can't register video device!\n");
 		kfree(tea575x_radio_inst);
 		return;

Re: [PATCH]V4L:some v4l drivers have error for video_register_device

[figo.zhang]

The function video_register_device() will call the video_register_device_index().
In this function, firtly it will do some argments check , if failed,it will return a 
negative number such as -EINVAL, and then do cdev_alloc() and device_register(), if
success return zero. so video_register_device_index() canot return a a positive number.

for example, see the drivers/media/video/stk-webcam.c (line 1325):

err = video_register_device(&dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
	if (err)
		STK_ERROR("v4l registration failed\n");
	else
		STK_INFO("Syntek USB2.0 Camera is now controlling video device"
			" /dev/video%d\n", dev->vdev.num);

in my opinion, it will be cleaner to do something like this:

err = video_register_device(&dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
	if (err != 0)
		STK_ERROR("v4l registration failed\n");
	else
		STK_INFO("Syntek USB2.0 Camera is now controlling video device"
			" /dev/video%d\n", dev->vdev.num);



Figo.zhang


On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 11:25 +0800, Figo.zhang wrote:
> For video_register_device(), it return zero means register success.It would be return zero
> or a negative number (on failure),it would not return a positive number.so it have better to
> use this to check err:
> 	int err = video_register_device(vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
> 	if (err != 0) {
> 		/*err code*/
> 	}
> 
>  
> Signed-off-by: Figo.zhang <figo1802@gmail.com>
> --- 
>  Documentation/video4linux/v4l2-framework.txt |    2 +-
>  drivers/media/radio/radio-maestro.c          |    2 +-
>  drivers/media/radio/radio-si470x.c           |    2 +-
>  drivers/media/video/cafe_ccic.c              |    2 +-
>  drivers/media/video/cx231xx/cx231xx-video.c  |    2 +-
>  drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-video.c    |    2 +-
>  drivers/media/video/et61x251/et61x251_core.c |    2 +-
>  drivers/media/video/hdpvr/hdpvr-video.c      |    2 +-
>  drivers/media/video/ivtv/ivtv-streams.c      |    2 +-
>  drivers/media/video/sn9c102/sn9c102_core.c   |    2 +-
>  drivers/media/video/stk-webcam.c             |    2 +-
>  drivers/media/video/w9968cf.c                |    2 +-
>  drivers/media/video/zc0301/zc0301_core.c     |    2 +-
>  drivers/media/video/zr364xx.c                |    2 +-
>  sound/i2c/other/tea575x-tuner.c              |    2 +-
>  15 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/video4linux/v4l2-framework.txt b/Documentation/video4linux/v4l2-framework.txt
> index 854808b..250232a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/video4linux/v4l2-framework.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/video4linux/v4l2-framework.txt
> @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ Next you register the video device: this will create the character device
>  for you.
>  
>  	err = video_register_device(vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
> -	if (err) {
> +	if (err != 0) {
>  		video_device_release(vdev); /* or kfree(my_vdev); */
>  		return err;
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/media/radio/radio-maestro.c b/drivers/media/radio/radio-maestro.c
> index 64d737c..b5e93c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/radio/radio-maestro.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/radio/radio-maestro.c
> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ static int __devinit maestro_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>  	video_set_drvdata(&dev->vdev, dev);
>  
>  	retval = video_register_device(&dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_RADIO, radio_nr);
> -	if (retval) {
> +	if (retval != 0) {
>  		v4l2_err(v4l2_dev, "can't register video device!\n");
>  		goto errfr1;
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/media/radio/radio-si470x.c b/drivers/media/radio/radio-si470x.c
> index bd945d0..edb520a 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/radio/radio-si470x.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/radio/radio-si470x.c
> @@ -1740,7 +1740,7 @@ static int si470x_usb_driver_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
>  
>  	/* register video device */
>  	retval = video_register_device(radio->videodev, VFL_TYPE_RADIO, radio_nr);
> -	if (retval) {
> +	if (retval != 0) {
>  		printk(KERN_WARNING DRIVER_NAME
>  				": Could not register video device\n");
>  		goto err_all;
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/cafe_ccic.c b/drivers/media/video/cafe_ccic.c
> index c4d181d..fd93698 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/cafe_ccic.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/cafe_ccic.c
> @@ -1974,7 +1974,7 @@ static int cafe_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>  /*	cam->vdev.debug = V4L2_DEBUG_IOCTL_ARG;*/
>  	cam->vdev.v4l2_dev = &cam->v4l2_dev;
>  	ret = video_register_device(&cam->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
> -	if (ret)
> +	if (ret != 0)
>  		goto out_smbus;
>  	video_set_drvdata(&cam->vdev, cam);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/cx231xx/cx231xx-video.c b/drivers/media/video/cx231xx/cx231xx-video.c
> index a23ae73..14e5008 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/cx231xx/cx231xx-video.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/cx231xx/cx231xx-video.c
> @@ -2382,7 +2382,7 @@ int cx231xx_register_analog_devices(struct cx231xx *dev)
>  	/* register v4l2 video video_device */
>  	ret = video_register_device(dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER,
>  				    video_nr[dev->devno]);
> -	if (ret) {
> +	if (ret != 0) {
>  		cx231xx_errdev("unable to register video device (error=%i).\n",
>  			       ret);
>  		return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-video.c b/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-video.c
> index 882796e..dcc3aca 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-video.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/em28xx/em28xx-video.c
> @@ -2013,7 +2013,7 @@ int em28xx_register_analog_devices(struct em28xx *dev)
>  	/* register v4l2 video video_device */
>  	ret = video_register_device(dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER,
>  				       video_nr[dev->devno]);
> -	if (ret) {
> +	if (ret != 0) {
>  		em28xx_errdev("unable to register video device (error=%i).\n",
>  			      ret);
>  		return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/et61x251/et61x251_core.c b/drivers/media/video/et61x251/et61x251_core.c
> index d1c1e45..8a767e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/et61x251/et61x251_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/et61x251/et61x251_core.c
> @@ -2591,7 +2591,7 @@ et61x251_usb_probe(struct usb_interface* intf, const struct usb_device_id* id)
>  
>  	err = video_register_device(cam->v4ldev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER,
>  				    video_nr[dev_nr]);
> -	if (err) {
> +	if (err != 0) {
>  		DBG(1, "V4L2 device registration failed");
>  		if (err == -ENFILE && video_nr[dev_nr] == -1)
>  			DBG(1, "Free /dev/videoX node not found");
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/hdpvr/hdpvr-video.c b/drivers/media/video/hdpvr/hdpvr-video.c
> index 3e6ffee..14c8488 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/hdpvr/hdpvr-video.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/hdpvr/hdpvr-video.c
> @@ -1237,7 +1237,7 @@ int hdpvr_register_videodev(struct hdpvr_device *dev, struct device *parent,
>  	dev->video_dev->parent = parent;
>  	video_set_drvdata(dev->video_dev, dev);
>  
> -	if (video_register_device(dev->video_dev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, devnum)) {
> +	if (video_register_device(dev->video_dev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, devnum) != 0) {
>  		v4l2_err(&dev->v4l2_dev, "video_device registration failed\n");
>  		goto error;
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/ivtv/ivtv-streams.c b/drivers/media/video/ivtv/ivtv-streams.c
> index 15da017..1aca6b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/ivtv/ivtv-streams.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/ivtv/ivtv-streams.c
> @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static int ivtv_reg_dev(struct ivtv *itv, int type)
>  	video_set_drvdata(s->vdev, s);
>  
>  	/* Register device. First try the desired minor, then any free one. */
> -	if (video_register_device(s->vdev, vfl_type, num)) {
> +	if (video_register_device(s->vdev, vfl_type, num) != 0) {
>  		IVTV_ERR("Couldn't register v4l2 device for %s kernel number %d\n",
>  				s->name, num);
>  		video_device_release(s->vdev);
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/sn9c102/sn9c102_core.c b/drivers/media/video/sn9c102/sn9c102_core.c
> index 23edfdc..55242c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/sn9c102/sn9c102_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/sn9c102/sn9c102_core.c
> @@ -3334,7 +3334,7 @@ sn9c102_usb_probe(struct usb_interface* intf, const struct usb_device_id* id)
>  
>  	err = video_register_device(cam->v4ldev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER,
>  				    video_nr[dev_nr]);
> -	if (err) {
> +	if (err != 0) {
>  		DBG(1, "V4L2 device registration failed");
>  		if (err == -ENFILE && video_nr[dev_nr] == -1)
>  			DBG(1, "Free /dev/videoX node not found");
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/stk-webcam.c b/drivers/media/video/stk-webcam.c
> index 1a6d39c..1a7aca0 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/stk-webcam.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/stk-webcam.c
> @@ -1323,7 +1323,7 @@ static int stk_register_video_device(struct stk_camera *dev)
>  	dev->vdev.debug = debug;
>  	dev->vdev.parent = &dev->interface->dev;
>  	err = video_register_device(&dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
> -	if (err)
> +	if (err != 0)
>  		STK_ERROR("v4l registration failed\n");
>  	else
>  		STK_INFO("Syntek USB2.0 Camera is now controlling video device"
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/w9968cf.c b/drivers/media/video/w9968cf.c
> index f59b2bd..5f56e90 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/w9968cf.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/w9968cf.c
> @@ -3500,7 +3500,7 @@ w9968cf_usb_probe(struct usb_interface* intf, const struct usb_device_id* id)
>  
>  	err = video_register_device(cam->v4ldev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER,
>  				    video_nr[dev_nr]);
> -	if (err) {
> +	if (err != 0) {
>  		DBG(1, "V4L device registration failed")
>  		if (err == -ENFILE && video_nr[dev_nr] == -1)
>  			DBG(2, "Couldn't find a free /dev/videoX node")
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/zc0301/zc0301_core.c b/drivers/media/video/zc0301/zc0301_core.c
> index 9697104..05296fc 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/zc0301/zc0301_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/zc0301/zc0301_core.c
> @@ -1991,7 +1991,7 @@ zc0301_usb_probe(struct usb_interface* intf, const struct usb_device_id* id)
>  
>  	err = video_register_device(cam->v4ldev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER,
>  				    video_nr[dev_nr]);
> -	if (err) {
> +	if (err != 0) {
>  		DBG(1, "V4L2 device registration failed");
>  		if (err == -ENFILE && video_nr[dev_nr] == -1)
>  			DBG(1, "Free /dev/videoX node not found");
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/zr364xx.c b/drivers/media/video/zr364xx.c
> index ac169c9..83d0aea 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/zr364xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/zr364xx.c
> @@ -857,7 +857,7 @@ static int zr364xx_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
>  	mutex_init(&cam->lock);
>  
>  	err = video_register_device(cam->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
> -	if (err) {
> +	if (err != 0) {
>  		dev_err(&udev->dev, "video_register_device failed\n");
>  		video_device_release(cam->vdev);
>  		kfree(cam->buffer);
> diff --git a/sound/i2c/other/tea575x-tuner.c b/sound/i2c/other/tea575x-tuner.c
> index d31c373..27bc7be 100644
> --- a/sound/i2c/other/tea575x-tuner.c
> +++ b/sound/i2c/other/tea575x-tuner.c
> @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ void snd_tea575x_init(struct snd_tea575x *tea)
>  
>  	retval = video_register_device(tea575x_radio_inst,
>  				       VFL_TYPE_RADIO, radio_nr);
> -	if (retval) {
> +	if (retval != 0) {
>  		printk(KERN_ERR "tea575x-tuner: can't register video device!\n");
>  		kfree(tea575x_radio_inst);
>  		return;
> 

Re: [PATCH]V4L:some v4l drivers have error for video_register_device

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi,

On Thursday 04 June 2009 06:20:07 figo.zhang wrote:
> The function video_register_device() will call the
> video_register_device_index(). In this function, firtly it will do some
> argments check , if failed,it will return a negative number such as
> -EINVAL, and then do cdev_alloc() and device_register(), if success return
> zero. so video_register_device_index() canot return a a positive number.
>
> for example, see the drivers/media/video/stk-webcam.c (line 1325):
>
> err = video_register_device(&dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
> 	if (err)
> 		STK_ERROR("v4l registration failed\n");
> 	else
> 		STK_INFO("Syntek USB2.0 Camera is now controlling video device"
> 			" /dev/video%d\n", dev->vdev.num);
>
> in my opinion, it will be cleaner to do something like this:
>
> err = video_register_device(&dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
> 	if (err != 0)
> 		STK_ERROR("v4l registration failed\n");
> 	else
> 		STK_INFO("Syntek USB2.0 Camera is now controlling video device"
> 			" /dev/video%d\n", dev->vdev.num);

What's the difference ? (err != 0) and (err) are identical.

Best regards,

Laurent Pinchart

Re: [PATCH]V4L:some v4l drivers have error for video_register_device

[figo.zhang]

On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 11:18 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thursday 04 June 2009 06:20:07 figo.zhang wrote:
> > The function video_register_device() will call the
> > video_register_device_index(). In this function, firtly it will do some
> > argments check , if failed,it will return a negative number such as
> > -EINVAL, and then do cdev_alloc() and device_register(), if success return
> > zero. so video_register_device_index() canot return a a positive number.
> >
> > for example, see the drivers/media/video/stk-webcam.c (line 1325):
> >
> > err = video_register_device(&dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
> > 	if (err)
> > 		STK_ERROR("v4l registration failed\n");
> > 	else
> > 		STK_INFO("Syntek USB2.0 Camera is now controlling video device"
> > 			" /dev/video%d\n", dev->vdev.num);
> >
> > in my opinion, it will be cleaner to do something like this:
> >
> > err = video_register_device(&dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
> > 	if (err != 0)
> > 		STK_ERROR("v4l registration failed\n");
> > 	else
> > 		STK_INFO("Syntek USB2.0 Camera is now controlling video device"
> > 			" /dev/video%d\n", dev->vdev.num);
> 
> What's the difference ? (err != 0) and (err) are identical.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Laurent Pinchart

yes, it is the same, but it is easy for reading.

Re: [PATCH]V4L:some v4l drivers have error for video_register_device

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab]

Em Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:20:50 +0800
"figo.zhang" <figo.zhang@kolorific.com> escreveu:

> On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 11:18 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Thursday 04 June 2009 06:20:07 figo.zhang wrote:
> > > The function video_register_device() will call the
> > > video_register_device_index(). In this function, firtly it will do some
> > > argments check , if failed,it will return a negative number such as
> > > -EINVAL, and then do cdev_alloc() and device_register(), if success return
> > > zero. so video_register_device_index() canot return a a positive number.
> > >
> > > for example, see the drivers/media/video/stk-webcam.c (line 1325):
> > >
> > > err = video_register_device(&dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
> > > 	if (err)
> > > 		STK_ERROR("v4l registration failed\n");
> > > 	else
> > > 		STK_INFO("Syntek USB2.0 Camera is now controlling video device"
> > > 			" /dev/video%d\n", dev->vdev.num);
> > >
> > > in my opinion, it will be cleaner to do something like this:
> > >
> > > err = video_register_device(&dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
> > > 	if (err != 0)
> > > 		STK_ERROR("v4l registration failed\n");
> > > 	else
> > > 		STK_INFO("Syntek USB2.0 Camera is now controlling video device"
> > > 			" /dev/video%d\n", dev->vdev.num);
> > 
> > What's the difference ? (err != 0) and (err) are identical.
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > 
> > Laurent Pinchart
> 
> yes, it is the same, but it is easy for reading.

if (err) is easier for reading, since it is closer to the natural language.

Also, as CodingStyle says, "C is a Spartan language". So, using just if (err)
is better than if (err != 0).

Also, since positive values don't indicate errors (on Linux, all errors are
negative values), using err != 0 looks wrong. Yet, changing they to err < 0
would require a careful review of the returned values by each function.

In summary, for newer code, the better is to always use if (err < 0), being
sure that the called function will return a negative value. However, I don't
see much sense on changing the current code.




Cheers,
Mauro

Re: [PATCH]V4L:some v4l drivers have error for video_register_device

[figo.zhang]

On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 11:18 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thursday 04 June 2009 06:20:07 figo.zhang wrote:
> > The function video_register_device() will call the
> > video_register_device_index(). In this function, firtly it will do some
> > argments check , if failed,it will return a negative number such as
> > -EINVAL, and then do cdev_alloc() and device_register(), if success return
> > zero. so video_register_device_index() canot return a a positive number.
> >
> > for example, see the drivers/media/video/stk-webcam.c (line 1325):
> >
> > err = video_register_device(&dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
> > 	if (err)
> > 		STK_ERROR("v4l registration failed\n");
> > 	else
> > 		STK_INFO("Syntek USB2.0 Camera is now controlling video device"
> > 			" /dev/video%d\n", dev->vdev.num);
> >
> > in my opinion, it will be cleaner to do something like this:
> >
> > err = video_register_device(&dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
> > 	if (err != 0)
> > 		STK_ERROR("v4l registration failed\n");
> > 	else
> > 		STK_INFO("Syntek USB2.0 Camera is now controlling video device"
> > 			" /dev/video%d\n", dev->vdev.num);
> 
> What's the difference ? (err != 0) and (err) are identical.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Laurent Pinchart

yes, it is the same, but it is easy for reading.

btw, see driver/media/video/ov511.c (line 5853):
	if (video_register_device(ov->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER,
			unit_video[i]) >= 0) {
			break;
		}

it would not return a positive number,i think. pls see my other path:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg06140.html

Re: [PATCH]V4L:some v4l drivers have error for video_register_device

[Hans Verkuil]

> On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 11:18 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thursday 04 June 2009 06:20:07 figo.zhang wrote:
>> > The function video_register_device() will call the
>> > video_register_device_index(). In this function, firtly it will do
>> some
>> > argments check , if failed,it will return a negative number such as
>> > -EINVAL, and then do cdev_alloc() and device_register(), if success
>> return
>> > zero. so video_register_device_index() canot return a a positive
>> number.
>> >
>> > for example, see the drivers/media/video/stk-webcam.c (line 1325):
>> >
>> > err = video_register_device(&dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
>> > 	if (err)
>> > 		STK_ERROR("v4l registration failed\n");
>> > 	else
>> > 		STK_INFO("Syntek USB2.0 Camera is now controlling video device"
>> > 			" /dev/video%d\n", dev->vdev.num);
>> >
>> > in my opinion, it will be cleaner to do something like this:
>> >
>> > err = video_register_device(&dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
>> > 	if (err != 0)
>> > 		STK_ERROR("v4l registration failed\n");
>> > 	else
>> > 		STK_INFO("Syntek USB2.0 Camera is now controlling video device"
>> > 			" /dev/video%d\n", dev->vdev.num);
>>
>> What's the difference ? (err != 0) and (err) are identical.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Laurent Pinchart
>
> yes, it is the same, but it is easy for reading.

To be honest, I think '(err)' is easier to read. Unless there is some new
CodingStyle rule I'm not aware of I see no reason for applying these
changes.

Regards,

        Hans

-- 
Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG

Re: [PATCH]V4L:some v4l drivers have error for video_register_device

[Figo.zhang]

On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 11:27 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 11:18 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Thursday 04 June 2009 06:20:07 figo.zhang wrote:
> >> > The function video_register_device() will call the
> >> > video_register_device_index(). In this function, firtly it will do
> >> some
> >> > argments check , if failed,it will return a negative number such as
> >> > -EINVAL, and then do cdev_alloc() and device_register(), if success
> >> return
> >> > zero. so video_register_device_index() canot return a a positive
> >> number.
> >> >
> >> > for example, see the drivers/media/video/stk-webcam.c (line 1325):
> >> >
> >> > err = video_register_device(&dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
> >> > 	if (err)
> >> > 		STK_ERROR("v4l registration failed\n");
> >> > 	else
> >> > 		STK_INFO("Syntek USB2.0 Camera is now controlling video device"
> >> > 			" /dev/video%d\n", dev->vdev.num);
> >> >
> >> > in my opinion, it will be cleaner to do something like this:
> >> >
> >> > err = video_register_device(&dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
> >> > 	if (err != 0)
> >> > 		STK_ERROR("v4l registration failed\n");
> >> > 	else
> >> > 		STK_INFO("Syntek USB2.0 Camera is now controlling video device"
> >> > 			" /dev/video%d\n", dev->vdev.num);
> >>
> >> What's the difference ? (err != 0) and (err) are identical.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> Laurent Pinchart
> >
> > yes, it is the same, but it is easy for reading.
> 
> To be honest, I think '(err)' is easier to read. Unless there is some new
> CodingStyle rule I'm not aware of I see no reason for applying these
> changes.
> 
> Regards,
> 
>         Hans
> 

yes, but i found the the kernel code using the '(err != 0) or (err == 0)' is
more popular,in v4l code for example:

v4l1-compat.c  line 507
v4l2-int-device.c  line 52
arv.c   line 333
arv.c   line 844,856

videobuf-core.c  line 529,766,984,1002,1053
videobuf-dma-sg.c  line 211,222,248,350,456,671,

.....

so i dont know which style is recommended for kernel code?

Best Regards,

Figo.zhang

Re: [PATCH]V4L:some v4l drivers have error for video_register_device

[Hans Verkuil]

On Friday 05 June 2009 04:51:36 Figo.zhang wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 11:27 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 11:18 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> On Thursday 04 June 2009 06:20:07 figo.zhang wrote:
> > >> > The function video_register_device() will call the
> > >> > video_register_device_index(). In this function, firtly it will do
> > >>
> > >> some
> > >>
> > >> > argments check , if failed,it will return a negative number such
> > >> > as -EINVAL, and then do cdev_alloc() and device_register(), if
> > >> > success
> > >>
> > >> return
> > >>
> > >> > zero. so video_register_device_index() canot return a a positive
> > >>
> > >> number.
> > >>
> > >> > for example, see the drivers/media/video/stk-webcam.c (line 1325):
> > >> >
> > >> > err = video_register_device(&dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
> > >> > 	if (err)
> > >> > 		STK_ERROR("v4l registration failed\n");
> > >> > 	else
> > >> > 		STK_INFO("Syntek USB2.0 Camera is now controlling video device"
> > >> > 			" /dev/video%d\n", dev->vdev.num);
> > >> >
> > >> > in my opinion, it will be cleaner to do something like this:
> > >> >
> > >> > err = video_register_device(&dev->vdev, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, -1);
> > >> > 	if (err != 0)
> > >> > 		STK_ERROR("v4l registration failed\n");
> > >> > 	else
> > >> > 		STK_INFO("Syntek USB2.0 Camera is now controlling video device"
> > >> > 			" /dev/video%d\n", dev->vdev.num);
> > >>
> > >> What's the difference ? (err != 0) and (err) are identical.
> > >>
> > >> Best regards,
> > >>
> > >> Laurent Pinchart
> > >
> > > yes, it is the same, but it is easy for reading.
> >
> > To be honest, I think '(err)' is easier to read. Unless there is some
> > new CodingStyle rule I'm not aware of I see no reason for applying
> > these changes.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >         Hans
>
> yes, but i found the the kernel code using the '(err != 0) or (err == 0)'
> is more popular,in v4l code for example:
>
> v4l1-compat.c  line 507
> v4l2-int-device.c  line 52
> arv.c   line 333
> arv.c   line 844,856
>
> videobuf-core.c  line 529,766,984,1002,1053
> videobuf-dma-sg.c  line 211,222,248,350,456,671,
>
> .....
>
> so i dont know which style is recommended for kernel code?

They are both equally valid. It simply doesn't matter, it is up to the 
programmer to use whatever he prefers.

But a quick grep over the v4l-dvb sources clearly shows a preference 
for '(err)':

grep '(err [!=]= 0)' -rsI .|wc -l
29

grep '(err)' -rsI .|wc -l
331

Regards,

	Hans

-- 
Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG Telecom