From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]:21267 "EHLO
	fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751283AbZK1Oms (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-media@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:42:48 -0500
Subject: Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel
 IR 	system?
From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
To: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
	Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>,
	Christoph Bartelmus <christoph@bartelmus.de>,
	jarod@wilsonet.com, awalls@radix.net, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com,
	j@jannau.net, jarod@redhat.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	mchehab@redhat.com, superm1@ubuntu.com
In-Reply-To: <m37hta28w9.fsf@intrepid.localdomain>
References: <9e4733910911270757j648e39ecl7487b7e6c43db828@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4B104971.4020800@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
	 <1259370501.11155.14.camel@maxim-laptop>
	 <m37hta28w9.fsf@intrepid.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:42:48 +0200
Message-ID: <1259419368.18747.0.camel@maxim-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-media.vger.kernel.org>

On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 12:20 +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: 
> Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > If we add in-kernel decoding, we still will end up with two different
> > decoding, one in kernel and one in lirc.
> 
> And that's good. Especially for a popular and simple protocol such as
> RC5.
> Actually, it's not about adding the decoder. It's about fixing it.
> I can fix it.

This is nonsense.