From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from proofpoint-cluster.metrocast.net ([65.175.128.136]:41771 "EHLO proofpoint-cluster.metrocast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754052Ab0GJNGy (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jul 2010 09:06:54 -0400 Subject: Re: [git:v4l-dvb/other] V4L/DVB: ivtv: use kthread_worker instead of workqueue From: Andy Walls To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-media@vger.kernel.org Cc: linuxtv-commits@linuxtv.org In-Reply-To: <4C386D62.4060202@redhat.com> References: <1278765186.2273.6.camel@localhost> <4C386D62.4060202@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 09:07:16 -0400 Message-ID: <1278767236.2273.33.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 2010-07-10 at 09:53 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em 10-07-2010 09:33, Andy Walls escreveu: > > On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 03:51 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >> This is an automatic generated email to let you know that the following patch were queued at the > >> http://git.linuxtv.org/v4l-dvb.git tree: > >> > >> Subject: V4L/DVB: ivtv: use kthread_worker instead of workqueue > >> Author: Tejun Heo > >> Date: Mon Jun 28 18:03:50 2010 -0300 > >> > >> Upcoming workqueue updates will no longer guarantee fixed workqueue to > >> worker kthread association, so giving RT priority to the irq worker > >> won't work. Use kthread_worker which guarantees specific kthread > >> association instead. This also makes setting the priority cleaner. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > >> Reviewed-by: Andy Walls > >> Acked-by: Andy Walls > >> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab > > > > Mauro, > > > > Please revert this or keep it from going upstream. > > I already did it locally at commit 635c644cdd1557a69e99bda0dcadaf006b66d432. > I just forgot to push it to the linuxtv repository ;) > I just updated upstream with this patch and another set of commits I did here. > :( Hmmm. I should really read my personal email more frequently than every few days. Is there anything you need me to do to help fix this? Provide my SOB on a reversion patch? Submit a reversion patch with an explanation and my SOB? Let me know. I should be available most of today (EDT timezone). Regards, Andy