Re: [PATCH] Add interlace support to sh_mobile_ceu_camera.c

[hermann pitton <hermann-pitton@arcor.de>]

Am Mittwoch, den 14.07.2010, 09:12 +0900 schrieb Kuninori Morimoto:
> Dear Guennadi
> 
> 
> > our luck, that mplayer (and gstreamer?) ignore returned field value. But 
> > we'll have to fix this in sh_mobile_ceu_camera.
> 
> Hmm  I understand.
> I guess, at first, we need test program for it.
> 
> 
> > Well, I think, 720p is a little too optimistic for tw9910;) tw9910 works 
> > on migor for me, but not on ecovec, although the chip can be detected. Are 
> > there any modifications necessary to the kernel or to the board to get it 
> > to work? Maybe a jumper or something? I plug in a video signal source in 
> > the "video in" connector, next to the "viceo out" one, using the same 
> > cable, so, cabling should work too. But I'm only getting select timeouts 
> > and no interrupts on the CEU.
> 
> Hmm..  strange...
> No kernel patch is needed to use tw9910 on Ecovec.
> 
> Ahh...
> Maybe the criminal is dip-switch.
> We can not use "tw9910" and "2nd camera" in same time.
> 
> Please check DS2[3] on Ecovec.
> It should OFF when you use tw9910.
> 
> I wrote dip-switch info on top of
> ${LINUX}/arch/sh/boards/mach-ecovec24/setup.c
> Please check it too.
> 
> Best regards
> --
> Kuninori Morimoto
>  


Kuninori,

you are well treated and highly honored by all staying in development
with you. For me it is just some glitch on the edges, but very well
noted.

For now, a dip-switch, you must have been abroad somewhere, can't be a
criminal. Or?

http://www.dip-switch.com/?gclid=COjg9Mn86aICFYSdzAodNEcLkQ

Could you eventually agree with that about what a dip-switch is or do I
miss what you mean?

Do you really tell there are still unclear dip-switches in 2010?

If so, please let's know, but then you can't do anything against such in
software, of course.

Cheers,
Hermann