From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.123]:62053 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755085Ab0IPOtO (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:49:14 -0400 Subject: Re: Remaining BKL users, what to do From: Steven Rostedt To: Arnd Bergmann , Jens Axboe Cc: codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu, autofs@linux.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Christoph Hellwig , Mikulas Patocka , Trond Myklebust , Petr Vandrovec , Anders Larsen , Jan Kara , Evgeniy Dushistov , Ingo Molnar , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Hendry In-Reply-To: <201009161632.59210.arnd@arndb.de> References: <201009161632.59210.arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:49:09 -0400 Message-ID: <1284648549.23787.26.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: Sender: On Thu, 2010-09-16 at 16:32 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The big kernel lock is gone from almost all code in linux-next, this is > the status of what I think will happen to the remaining users: > kernel/trace/blktrace.c: > Should be easy. Ingo? Steven? > Jens, Git blame shows this to be your code (copied from block/blktrace.c from years past). Is the lock_kernel() needed here? (although Arnd did add it in 62c2a7d9) -- Steve