Re: [PATCH 3/5] IR: ene_ir: few bugfixes

[Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>]

On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:02 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 06:06:37PM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > This is a result of last round of debug with
> > Sami R <maesesami@gmail.com>.
> > 
> > Thank you Sami very much!
> > 
> > The biggest bug I fixed is that,
> > I was clobbering the CIRCFG register after it is setup
> > That wasn't a good idea really
> > 
> > And some small refactoring, etc.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/media/IR/ene_ir.c |   43 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> >  1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/IR/ene_ir.c b/drivers/media/IR/ene_ir.c
> > index dc32509..8639621 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/IR/ene_ir.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/IR/ene_ir.c
> ...
> > @@ -282,6 +287,7 @@ static void ene_rx_setup(struct ene_device *dev)
> >  		ene_set_reg_mask(dev, ENE_CIRCFG, ENE_CIRCFG_CARR_DEMOD);
> >  
> >  		/* Enable carrier detection */
> > +		ene_write_reg(dev, ENE_CIRCAR_PULS, 0x63);
> 
> Looks sane, though I'd prefer to see symbolic bit names or some such thing
> here instead of 0x63. Not something to hold up the patch though.
> 
> Acked-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
> 
63 isn't a bitfileld, but rather two numbers.
3 is number of carrier pulses to skip, and 6 is number of carrier pulses
to average.

I have a note about that in header.

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky