From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from proofpoint-cluster.metrocast.net ([65.175.128.136]:34881 "EHLO proofpoint-cluster.metrocast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753774Ab1APT3x (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Jan 2011 14:29:53 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ir-kbd-i2c, lirc_zilog: Allow bridge drivers to pass an IR trasnceiver mutex to I2C IR modules From: Andy Walls To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Jarod Wilson , Jean Delvare , Linux Media Mailing List , Janne Grunau , Jarod Wilson In-Reply-To: <4D333877.6040900@redhat.com> References: <1295149788.7147.34.camel@localhost> <4D333877.6040900@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 14:29:27 -0500 Message-ID: <1295206167.2400.36.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-ID: Sender: On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 16:27 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Jarod/Andy, > > For now, I'm marking all those ir-kbd-i2c/lirc_zilog patches as "RFC" at patchwork, > as I'm not sure if they're ok, and because there are a few revisions of them and > I'm afraid to apply some wrong version. And that's just fine. :) That particular RFC was to get mostly Jean's opinion on adding fields to struct IR_i2c_init_data and struct IR_i2c and code to ir-kbd-i2c. > Please, after finishing and testing, send me a patch series or, preferably, a > git pull with those stuff. I just sent a [GIT PATCHES for 2.6.38], which is my pull request. It fixes one minor regression in ir-kbd-i2c.c. The rest of the patches are limited to lirc_zilog and do not modify any bridge drivers. The lirc_zilog changes were tested by me using my HVR-1600. Jarrod will have to ask you to pull any hdpvr fixes, when he feels they are ready. Note my pull request does *not* include the patches in the subject [RFC PATCH], so no worries about pulling those in. :) I'll submit a pull for those when they are correct and ready. Regards, Andy