public inbox for linux-media@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@gmail.com>
To: Antti Palosaari <crope@iki.fi>
Cc: linux-media <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dvb_usb_v2: use pointers to properties[REGRESSION]
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 19:12:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1339870370.1865.37.camel@Route3278> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FDCABDA.2000000@iki.fi>

On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 18:52 +0300, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> On 06/16/2012 03:06 PM, Malcolm Priestley wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 04:16 +0300, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> >> I did example for you, here you are :)
> >>
> >> On 06/16/2012 03:55 AM, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> >>> On 06/16/2012 03:35 AM, Malcolm Priestley wrote:
> >>>> On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 01:54 +0300, Antti Palosaari wrote:
> >>>>> Hello Malcolm,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 06/16/2012 01:11 AM, Malcolm Priestley wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi Antti
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You can't have dvb_usb_device_properties as constant structure pointer.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> At run time it needs to be copied to a private area.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Having constant structure for properties was one of main idea of whole
> >>>>> change. Earlier it causes some problems when driver changes those values
> >>>>> - for example remote configuration based info from the eeprom.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Two or more devices of the same type on the system will be pointing to
> >>>>>> the same structure.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes and no. You can define struct dvb_usb_device_properties for each
> >>>>> USB ID.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Any changes they make to the structure will be common to all.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For those devices having same USB ID only.
> >>>>> Changing dvb_usb_device_properties is *not* allowed. It is constant and
> >>>>> should be. That was how I designed it. Due to that I introduced those
> >>>>> new callbacks to resolve needed values dynamically.
> >>>> Yes, but it does make run-time tweaks difficult.
> >>>>
> >>>>> If there is still something that is needed to resolve at runtime I am
> >>>>> happy to add new callback. For example PID filter configuration is
> >>>>> static currently as per adapter and if it is needed to to reconfigure at
> >>>>> runtime new callback is needed.
> >>>> I will look at the PID filter later, it defaulted to off.
> >>>>
> >>>> However, in my builds for ARM devices it is defaulted on. I will be
> >>>> testing this later. I can't see any problems.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Could you say what is your problem I can likely say how to resolve it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Well, the problem is, I now need two separate structures for LME2510 and
> >>>> LME2510C as in the existing driver, the hope was to merge them as one.
> >>>> The only difference being the stream endpoint number.
> >>>
> >>> Then you should use .get_usb_stream_config() instead of static stream
> >>> configuration. That is now supported.
> >>>
> >>> I have found one logical error in my current implementation.
> >>> get_usb_stream_config gets frontend as a parameter, but it is called
> >>> frontend == NULL when attaching adapters and after that frontend is real
> >>> value when called (just before streaming is started). Now what happens
> >>> if we has multiple adapters? We cannot know which adapter is requested
> >>> during attach since FE is NULL :)
> >>> But that is problem case only if you have multiple adapters. I will find
> >>> out better solution next few days. It is ugly now.
> >>> You can just skip fe checking or something. See AF9015 for example.
> >>>
> >>>> Currently, it is implemented in identify_state on dvb_usb_v2.
> >>>>
> >>>> The get_usb_stream_config has no access to device to to allow a run-time
> >>>> change there.
> >>>
> >>> Hmmm, what you try to say? As FE is given as a pointer, you have also
> >>> adapter and device. Those are nested, device is root, then adapter is
> >>> under that and finally frontend are under the adapter.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> .
> >>> └── device
> >>>       ├── adapter0
> >>>       │   ├── frontend0
> >>>       │   ├── frontend1
> >>>       │   └── frontend2
> >>>       └── adapter1
> >>>           ├── frontend0
> >>>           ├── frontend1
> >>>           └── frontend2
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> regards
> >>> Antti
> >>
> >> static int lme2510_get_usb_stream_config(struct dvb_frontend *fe,
> >> 		struct usb_data_stream_properties *stream)
> >> {
> >> 	struct dvb_usb_adapter *adap;
> >> 	struct lme2510_state *state;
> >>
> >> 	stream->type = USB_BULK;
> >> 	stream->count = 10;
> >> 	stream->u.bulk.buffersize = 4096;
> >>
> >> // ugly part begins
> >> 	if (fe == NULL)
> >> 		return 0;
> >> 	adap = fe->dvb->priv;
> >> 	state = adap->dev->priv;
> >> // ugly part ends
> >>
> >> 	if (state->chip_id == lme2510c)
> >> 		stream->endpoint = 8;
> >> 	else
> >> 		stream->endpoint = 6;
> >>
> >> 	return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> Ugly part between comments is what I am going to change, but currently
> >> it works as is.
> >>
> > This doesn't work because the code will return the stream->endpoint
> > unset and then try to initialise usb_urb_init.
> 
> So what? It happens only once when device is initialized. We do not need 
> to know endpoint at that phase as we do not stream yet.
Please read your code you submit the urbs.

int dvb_usb_adapter_stream_init(struct dvb_usb_adapter *adap)
{
	int ret;
	struct usb_data_stream_properties stream_props;

	adap->stream.udev = adap->dev->udev;
	adap->stream.user_priv = adap;

	/* resolve USB stream configuration for buffer alloc */
	if (adap->dev->props->get_usb_stream_config) {
		ret = adap->dev->props->get_usb_stream_config(NULL,
				&stream_props);
		if (ret < 0)
			return ret;
	} else {
		stream_props = adap->props->stream;
	}

	/* FIXME: can be removed as set later in anyway */
	adap->stream.complete = dvb_usb_data_complete;

	return usb_urb_init(&adap->stream, &stream_props); <<<<----here
}
> 
> > It would be far better to have get_usb_stream_config point to adapter
> > and point to adap->fe[adap->active_fe] inside if need be.
> 
> Why?
Again read your code. why do we need frontend ? ... we want adapter.

Always pointing to same adapter regardless of frontend number.

static int af9015_get_usb_stream_config(struct dvb_frontend *fe,
		struct usb_data_stream_properties *stream)
{
	struct dvb_usb_adapter *adap;

	deb_info("%s: fe=%p\n", __func__, fe);

	stream->type = USB_BULK;
	stream->count = 8;
	stream->endpoint = 0x84;
	stream->u.bulk.buffersize = TS_USB20_FRAME_SIZE;

	if (fe == NULL)
		return 0;

	 adap = fe->dvb->priv; <<< always same adapter

	if (adap->id == 1)
		stream->endpoint = 0x85;

	if (adap->dev->udev->speed == USB_SPEED_FULL)
		stream->u.bulk.buffersize = TS_USB11_FRAME_SIZE;

	return 0;
}

> As we are going to configure stream based _frontend_ current needs we 
> just need to know frontend and nothing more or less. If you pass adapter 
> as a parameter then you don't know what is frontend in question as 
> adapter coould have multiple frontends.
> 
> active_fe member variable is meant to be internal use of DVB USB 
> framework. You should not use it from the driver. You can see active 
> frontend id just looking current frontend id (fe->id).
> 
> > This is also the case with af9015, the code is extracting adapter
> > through another module.
> 
> I don't understand what you mean.
> 
> Also I would like to ask if you test code I given at all?
Yes, system crash. Endpoint not set.
> 
> You seems not to understand that callback - get_usb_stream_config() - is 
> there for configuring stream dynamically.
With get_usb_stream_config as;

	int (*get_usb_stream_config) (struct dvb_usb_adapter *,
			struct usb_data_stream_properties *);


If we really need the frontend we do this.

static int driverxxx_get_usb_stream_config(struct dvb_usb_adapter *adap,
		struct usb_data_stream_properties *stream)
{
	struct dvb_frontend *fe = adap->fe[adap->active_fe];
....

Regards


Malcolm





  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-16 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-15 22:11 dvb_usb_v2: use pointers to properties[REGRESSION] Malcolm Priestley
2012-06-15 22:54 ` Antti Palosaari
2012-06-16  0:35   ` Malcolm Priestley
2012-06-16  0:55     ` Antti Palosaari
2012-06-16  1:16       ` Antti Palosaari
2012-06-16 12:06         ` Malcolm Priestley
2012-06-16 15:52           ` Antti Palosaari
2012-06-16 18:12             ` Malcolm Priestley [this message]
2012-06-16 18:41               ` Antti Palosaari
2012-06-16 20:17                 ` Malcolm Priestley
2012-06-16 20:27                   ` Antti Palosaari

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1339870370.1865.37.camel@Route3278 \
    --to=tvboxspy@gmail.com \
    --cc=crope@iki.fi \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox