From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:48289 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751457AbaFKLjw (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2014 07:39:52 -0400 Message-ID: <1402486791.4107.132.camel@paszta.hi.pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 40/43] media: imx6: Add support for MIPI CSI-2 OV5640 From: Philipp Zabel To: Steve Longerbeam Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Steve Longerbeam Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:39:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1402178205-22697-41-git-send-email-steve_longerbeam@mentor.com> References: <1402178205-22697-1-git-send-email-steve_longerbeam@mentor.com> <1402178205-22697-41-git-send-email-steve_longerbeam@mentor.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am Samstag, den 07.06.2014, 14:56 -0700 schrieb Steve Longerbeam: > +static const struct i2c_device_id ov5640_id[] = { > + {"ov5640_mipi", 0}, Is there really a different ov5640_mipi chip as opposed to ov5640? I suspect this could be well configured in the OF graph endpoint. regards Philipp