From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com ([95.142.166.194]:44101 "EHLO perceval.ideasonboard.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030372Ab2CFT5D (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Mar 2012 14:57:03 -0500 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Sakari Ailus Cc: Tomasz Stanislawski , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dacohen@gmail.com, snjw23@gmail.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, tuukkat76@gmail.com, k.debski@samsung.com, riverful@gmail.com, hverkuil@xs4all.nl, teturtia@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/34] v4l: VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_SELECTION and VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_SELECTION IOCTLs Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 20:57:22 +0100 Message-ID: <1414506.aeJ7eL5TfP@avalon> In-Reply-To: <4F566BC8.9090400@iki.fi> References: <20120302173219.GA15695@valkosipuli.localdomain> <4F563E02.7010406@samsung.com> <4F566BC8.9090400@iki.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tuesday 06 March 2012 21:55:52 Sakari Ailus wrote: > Tomasz Stanislawski wrote: > > On 03/06/2012 05:27 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> On Tuesday 06 March 2012 17:50:36 Sakari Ailus wrote: > >>> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 11:59:22AM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >>>> On Friday 02 March 2012 19:30:12 Sakari Ailus wrote: > >>>>> Add support for VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_SELECTION and > >>>>> VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_SELECTION > >>>>> IOCTLs. They replace functionality provided by VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_CROP > >>>>> and > >>>>> VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_CROP IOCTLs and also add new functionality > >>>>> (composing). > >>>>> > >>>>> VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_CROP and VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_CROP continue to be > >>>>> supported. > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus > >>>> > >>>> Except for the ACTIVE name, > >>>> > >>>> Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart > >>>> > >>>> Maybe we could discuss this on IRC with Tomasz ? > >>> > >>> Tomasz wasn't online when I checked. > >>> > >>> How about "CURRENT"? > >> > >> Sounds good to me. Let's see if Tomasz will be online tomorrow ;-) > > > > Hi, > > > > What do you think about ACTIVE -> ACTUAL? > > Similar word with the same number of letters :) > > Sounds good to me; perhaps even better than CURRENT. I'm fine with > either with perhaps a small inclination towards "actual". > > Laurent? ACTUAL is good. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart