public inbox for linux-media@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Julien BERAUD <julien.beraud@parrot.com>
Cc: jean-philippe francois <jp.francois@cynove.com>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>,
	linux-media <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Lockup on second streamon with omap3-isp
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:32:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454034.b7COp5DhyG@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50CB3535.2080400@parrot.com>

Hi Julien,

On Friday 14 December 2012 15:18:29 Julien BERAUD wrote:
> Hi Jean-Philippe,
> 
> I have had exactly the same problem and the following workaround has
> caused no regression on our board yet.
> I can't explain exactly why it works and I think that it is internal to
> the isp.
> 
> In function ccdc_set_stream, don't disable the ccdc_subclk when stopping
> capture:
> 
>                  ret = ccdc_disable(ccdc);
>                  if (ccdc->output & CCDC_OUTPUT_MEMORY)
>                          omap3isp_sbl_disable(isp,
> OMAP3_ISP_SBL_CCDC_WRITE);
> -               omap3isp_subclk_disable(isp, OMAP3_ISP_SUBCLK_CCDC);
> +               //omap3isp_subclk_disable(isp, OMAP3_ISP_SUBCLK_CCDC);
> 
> I know that it is still a workaround but I hope that maybe it will help
> someone to understand the real cause of this issue.

Do you get CCDC stop timeouts ? They are reported in the kernel log as "CCDC 
stop timeout!".

> Le 13/12/2012 15:14, jean-philippe francois a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I have news on the "IRQ storm on second streamon" problem.
> > Reminder :
> > Given a perfectly fine HSYNC / VSYNC / PIXELCLOK configuration, the
> > omap3-isp (at least until 3.4) will go into an interrupt storm when
> > streamon is called for the second time, unless you are able to stop
> > the sensor when not streaming. I have reproduced this on three
> > different board, with three different sensor.
> > 
> > On board 1, the problem disappeared by itself (in fact not by itself,
> > see below) and the board is not in my possession anymore.
> > On board 2, I implemented a working s_stream operation in the subdev
> > driver, so the problem was solved because the sensor would effectively
> > stop streaming when told to, keeping the ISP + CCDC happy
> > On board 3, I can't stop the streaming, or I did not figure out how to
> > make it stop  yet.
> > 
> > I tried to disable the HS_VS_IRQ, but it did not help, so I came back
> > looking at the code of board 1, which was running fine with a 3.4
> > kernel. And I discovered the problem doesn't happen if I break the
> > pipeline between two consecutive streamon.
> > 
> > In other word if I do the following :
> > 
> > media-ctl -l '16:0->5:0[1], 5:1->6:0[1]'
> > media-ctl -f '16:0 [SBGGR8 2560x800 (0, 0)/2560x800]'
> > yavta ....
> > yavta ...       <--------- board locks up, soft lockup is fired
> > 
> > But if I do this instead :
> > 
> > media-ctl -l '16:0->5:0[0], 5:1->6:0[0]'
> > media-ctl -l '16:0->5:0[1], 5:1->6:0[1]'
> > media-ctl -f '16:0 [SBGGR8 2560x800 (0, 0)/2560x800]'
> > yavta ....
> > media-ctl -l '16:0->5:0[0], 5:1->6:0[0]'
> > media-ctl -l '16:0->5:0[1], 5:1->6:0[1]'
> > media-ctl -f '16:0 [SBGGR8 2560x800 (0, 0)/2560x800]'
> > yavta ...       <--------- image are acquired, board doesn't lock up
> > anymore

Now this really doesn't make much sense to me. Both sequences should produce 
the exact same hardware accesses.

Could you add a printk in isp_reg_writel 
(drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/isp.h) and compare the register writes for 
both sequences ?

> > It would be interesting to go from this workaround to the elimination of
> > the root cause. What can I do / test next to stop this bug from hapenning
> > ?

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-17  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-06 17:08 Lockup on second streamon with omap3-isp jean-philippe francois
2012-03-07 14:24 ` jean-philippe francois
2012-03-08 17:22   ` Sakari Ailus
2012-03-08 23:28     ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-03-09  7:30       ` jean-philippe francois
2012-03-09 10:42         ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-03-09 12:54           ` Michael Jones
2012-03-09 12:58             ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-03-09 15:55           ` jean-philippe francois
2012-12-13 14:14             ` jean-philippe francois
2012-12-14 14:18               ` Julien BERAUD
2012-12-17  9:32                 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2012-12-17 15:41                   ` jean-philippe francois
2012-12-17 16:09                     ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-12-18 10:13                   ` Julien BERAUD

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1454034.b7COp5DhyG@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=jp.francois@cynove.com \
    --cc=julien.beraud@parrot.com \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox