Re: [PATCH resend] [media] uvcvideo: zero seq number when disabling stream

Hans Yang
2017-10-19T07:24:23Z

Hi Laurent and Guennadi,

On 2017年10月18日 16:52, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> (CC'ing Guennadi Liakhovetski)
>>
>> Thank you for the patch.
>>
>> On Friday, 15 September 2017 09:27:51 EEST Hans Yang wrote:
>>> For bulk-based devices, when disabling the video stream,
>>> in addition to issue CLEAR_FEATURE(HALT), it is better to set
>>> alternate setting 0 as well or the sequnce number in host
>>> side will probably not reset to zero.
>>
>> The USB 2.0 specificatin states in the description of the SET_INTERFACE
>> request that "If a device only supports a default setting for the specified
>> interface, then a STALL may be returned in the Status stage of the request".
>>
>> The Linux implementation of usb_set_interface() deals with this by handling
>> STALL conditions and manually clearing HALT for all endpoints in the
>> interface, but I'm still concerned that this change could break existing bulk-
>> based cameras. Do you know what other operating systems do when disabling the
>> stream on bulk cameras ? According to a comment in the driver Windows calls
>> CLEAR_FEATURE(HALT), but the situation might have changed since that was
>> tested.

Sorry I did not mention that it is about SS bulk-based cameras using
sequence number technique.
From my observations, invoking usb_clear_halt() will reset the endpoint
in the device side via CLEAR_FEATURE(HALT)
and reset the sequence number as well; however usb_reset_endpoint() does
not reset the host side endpoint with xhci driver,
then the sequence number will mismatch in next time stream enable.
I can always observe this through a bus analyzer on Linux implementation
whatever X86 or ARM based.
This is not observed on the Windows.

>>
>> Guennadi, how do your bulk-based cameras handle this ?
>
> I don't know what design decisions are implemented there, but I tested a
> couple of cameras for sending a STREAMOFF after a few captured buffers,
> sleeping for a couple of seconds, requeuing buffers, sending STREAMON and
> capturing a few more - that seems to have worked. "Seems" because I only
> used a modified version of capture-example, I haven't checked buffer
> contents.
>
> BTW, Hans, may I ask - what cameras did you use?

I have three SS bulk-based cameras as follows:
e-con Systems See3CAM_CU130 (2560:c1d0)
Leopard ZED (2b03:f580)
Intel(R) RealSense(TM) Camera SR300 (8086:0aa5)

I can observe the same issue on all above;
besides, to reproduce issue do not let the camera enter suspend because
it will *help* to reset the sequence number through usb_set_interface(0).

>
> Thanks
> Guennadi
>
>>> Then in next time video stream start, the device will expect
>>> host starts packet from 0 sequence number but host actually
>>> continue the sequence number from last transaction and this
>>> causes transaction errors.
>>
>> Do you mean the DATA0/DATA1 toggle ? Why does the host continue toggling the
>> PID from the last transation ? The usb_clear_halt() function calls
>> usb_reset_endpoint() which should reset the DATA PID toggle.
>>
>>> This commit fixes this by adding set alternate setting 0 back
>>> as what isoch-based devices do.
>>>
>>> Below error message will also be eliminated for some devices:
>>> uvcvideo: Non-zero status (-71) in video completion handler.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hans Yang <hansy@nvidia.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c | 5 ++---
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
>>> b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c index fb86d6af398d..ad80c2a6da6a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_video.c
>>> @@ -1862,10 +1862,9 @@ int uvc_video_enable(struct uvc_streaming *stream,
>>> int enable)
>>>
>>> if (!enable) {
>>> uvc_uninit_video(stream, 1);
>>> - if (stream->intf->num_altsetting > 1) {
>>> - usb_set_interface(stream->dev->udev,
>>> + usb_set_interface(stream->dev->udev,
>>> stream->intfnum, 0);
>>> - } else {
>>> + if (stream->intf->num_altsetting == 1) {
>>> /* UVC doesn't specify how to inform a bulk-based device
>>> * when the video stream is stopped. Windows sends a
>>> * CLEAR_FEATURE(HALT) request to the video streaming
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Laurent Pinchart
>>

Regards,
Hans Yang
--nvpublic--