From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from galahad.ideasonboard.com ([185.26.127.97]:43744 "EHLO
        galahad.ideasonboard.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752465AbeB1PUi (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-media@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 28 Feb 2018 10:20:38 -0500
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Cc: Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: Patch review
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 17:21:27 +0200
Message-ID: <1552444.87XHR44T4u@avalon>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802281559500.29266@axis700.grange>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802281559500.29266@axis700.grange>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-media.vger.kernel.org>

Hi Guennadi,

On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 17:07:00 EET Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I know the "development process and responsibilities" was the main topic
> during the last media summit. Unfortunately I haven't attended it, from
> the etherpad notes I also cannot quite conclude what decisions have been
> made. Have any measures been discussed and agreed upon for cases, when
> patches don't get reviewed for many months, adding up to more than a year
> (in this specific case the first version submitted in June 2016)?

I assume you're talking about the "[PATCH 0/2 v6] uvcvideo: asynchronous 
controls" series, is that correct ?

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart