From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE508C10F11 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E8B20850 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732703AbfDJOW6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:22:58 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([85.220.165.71]:48353 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732666AbfDJOW6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:22:58 -0400 Received: from lupine.hi.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:100:3ad5:47ff:feaf:1a17] helo=lupine) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hEE7s-0006dP-Lq; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:22:56 +0200 Message-ID: <1554906176.3765.9.camel@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] media: coda: limit frame interval enumeration to supported frame sizes From: Philipp Zabel To: Hans Verkuil , linux-media@vger.kernel.org Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:22:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20190408123256.22868-1-p.zabel@pengutronix.de> <20190408123256.22868-7-p.zabel@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:3ad5:47ff:feaf:1a17 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2019-04-10 at 15:43 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote: [...] > > @@ -1126,12 +1127,32 @@ static int coda_enum_frameintervals(struct file *file, void *fh, [...] > > Why support VIDIOC_ENUM_FRAMEINTERVALS at all? It makes no sense for a codec. > I'd remove it altogether. It returns the range supported by the frame rate registers that can be set for constant bitrate encoding. I think the idea was to let the GStreamer v4l2 elements know about possible frame rate range. I think I should be able to remove it without any negative effects. regards Philipp