Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] rc: Add IR encode based wakeup filtering

[James Hogan <james@albanarts.com>]

Hi Mauro,

On Wednesday 23 July 2014 16:39:36 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Fri, 14 Mar 2014 23:04:10 +0000
> 
> James Hogan <james@albanarts.com> escreveu:
> > A recent discussion about proposed interfaces for setting up the
> > hardware wakeup filter lead to the conclusion that it could help to have
> > the generic capability to encode and modulate scancodes into raw IR
> > events so that drivers for hardware with a low level wake filter (on the
> > level of pulse/space durations) can still easily implement the higher
> > level scancode interface that is proposed.
> > 
> > I posted an RFC patchset showing how this could work, and Antti Seppälä
> > posted additional patches to support rc5-sz and nuvoton-cir. This
> > patchset improves the original RFC patches and combines & updates
> > Antti's patches.
> > 
> > I'm happy these patches are a good start at tackling the problem, as
> > long as Antti is happy with them and they work for him of course.
> > 
> > Future work could include:
> >  - Encoders for more protocols.
> >  - Carrier signal events (no use unless a driver makes use of it).
> > 
> > Patch 1 adds the new encode API.
> > Patches 2-3 adds some modulation helpers.
> > Patches 4-6 adds some raw encode implementations.
> > Patch 7 adds some rc-core support for encode based wakeup filtering.
> > Patch 8 adds debug loopback of encoded scancode when filter set.
> > Patch 9 (untested) adds encode based wakeup filtering to nuvoton-cir.
> 
> > Changes in v2:
> Any news about this patch series? There are some comments about them,
> so I'll be tagging it as "changes requested" at patchwork, waiting
> for a v3 (or is it already there in the middle of the 49 patches from
> David?).

This patch series seems to have been forgotten. I do have a few changes on top 
of v2 to address the review comments, so as you say I should probably rebase 
and do a v3 at some point.

Cheers
James