From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hansverk@cisco.com>
Cc: linux-media <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>,
Pawel Osciak <pawel@osciak.com>,
Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] vb2: regression fix for vbi capture & poll
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 13:32:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1622124.9R2KLtfafx@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <541810E2.4040509@cisco.com>
Hi Hans,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tuesday 16 September 2014 12:28:50 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> (My proposal to fix this. Note that it is untested, I plan to do that this
> evening)
>
> Commit 9241650d62f7 broke vbi capture applications that expect POLLERR to be
> returned if STREAMON wasn't called.
>
> Rather than checking whether buffers were queued AND vb2 was not yet
> streaming, just check whether streaming is in progress and return POLLERR
> if not.
>
> This change makes it impossible to poll in one thread and call STREAMON in
> another, but doing that breaks existing applications and is also not
> according to the spec. So be it.
I like this approach better than reverting the offending patch, as it doesn't
break my use case :-)
If we decide that this is the right fix, we should update the V4L2
specification to reflect that.
I've proposed an alternative solution in a reply to the "[PATCH/RFC v2 1/2]
v4l: vb2: Don't return POLLERR during transient buffer underruns" mail thread.
I think I like this patch better, as the behaviour is simpler, even if it
doesn't strictly conform to the spec.
> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
> b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c index 7e6aff6..0452fb2 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-core.c
> @@ -2583,10 +2583,10 @@ unsigned int vb2_poll(struct vb2_queue *q, struct
> file *file, poll_table *wait) }
>
> /*
> - * There is nothing to wait for if no buffer has been queued and the
> - * queue isn't streaming, or if the error flag is set.
> + * There is nothing to wait for if the queue isn't streaming, or if
> + * the error flag is set.
> */
> - if ((list_empty(&q->queued_list) && !vb2_is_streaming(q)) || q->error)
> + if (!vb2_is_streaming(q) || q->error)
> return res | POLLERR;
>
> /*
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-16 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-16 10:28 [RFC PATCH] vb2: regression fix for vbi capture & poll Hans Verkuil
2014-09-16 10:32 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-09-16 9:28 Hans Verkuil
2014-09-16 13:50 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2014-09-16 14:02 ` Hans Verkuil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1622124.9R2KLtfafx@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=hansverk@cisco.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.chehab@samsung.com \
--cc=nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com \
--cc=pawel@osciak.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).