From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com ([95.142.166.194]:56476 "EHLO perceval.ideasonboard.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753180AbaBTN3S (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Feb 2014 08:29:18 -0500 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Michael Opdenacker Cc: m.chehab@samsung.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com, yongjun_wei@trendmicro.com.cn, sakari.ailus@iki.fi, hans.verkuil@cisco.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] [media] davinci: vpfe: remove deprecated IRQF_DISABLED Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:30:29 +0100 Message-ID: <1688708.1hcDfqTyU5@avalon> In-Reply-To: <53060055.2010408@free-electrons.com> References: <4210530.AR5GZgidVz@avalon> <53060055.2010408@free-electrons.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Michael, On Thursday 20 February 2014 14:17:09 Michael Opdenacker wrote: > On 02/20/2014 12:36 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > > > What's the status of this patch ? Do expect Prabhakar to pick it up, or do > > you plan to push all your IRQF_DISABLED removal patches in one go ? > > It's true a good number of my patches haven't been picked up yet, even > after multiple resends. Maintainers might have assumed that you would push all the patches yourself. That might be why Prabhakar has acked your patch but hasn't picked it up. > I was planning to ask the community tomorrow about what to do to finally > get rid of IRQF_DISABLED. Effectively, pushing all the remaining changes > in one go (or removing the definition of IRQF_DISABLED) may be the final > solution. > > I hope to be able to answer your question by the end of the week. > > Thanks for getting back to me about this! -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart