From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com ([95.142.166.194]:48478 "EHLO
	perceval.ideasonboard.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1758363Ab3KZWDk (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-media@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 26 Nov 2013 17:03:40 -0500
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: Valentine <valentine.barshak@cogentembedded.com>,
	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>,
	Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>,
	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
	Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] media: i2c: Add ADV761X support
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 23:03:42 +0100
Message-ID: <16902508.hqJSb2Hj3Q@avalon>
In-Reply-To: <52951AA7.4030202@metafoo.de>
References: <1384520071-16463-1-git-send-email-valentine.barshak@cogentembedded.com> <692757747.1f4Evv5u9p@avalon> <52951AA7.4030202@metafoo.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-media.vger.kernel.org>

On Tuesday 26 November 2013 23:03:19 Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 11:00 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 26 November 2013 22:43:32 Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> >> On 11/26/2013 10:28 PM, Valentine wrote:
> >>> On 11/20/2013 07:53 PM, Valentine wrote:
> >>>> On 11/20/2013 07:42 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Valentine,
> >>> 
> >>> Hi Hans,
> >>> 
> >>>>> Did you ever look at this adv7611 driver:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx/commit/610b9d5de22ae7c0047c65a07e
> >>>>> 4afa42af2daa12
> >>>> 
> >>>> No, I missed that one somehow, although I did search for the
> >>>> adv7611/7612 before implementing this one.
> >>>> I'm going to look closer at the patch and test it.
> >>> 
> >>> I've tried the patch and I doubt that it was ever tested on adv7611.
> >> 
> >> It was and it works.
> >> 
> >>> I haven't been able to make it work so far. Here's the description of
> >>> some of the issues I've encountered.
> >>> 
> >>> The patch does not apply cleanly so I had to make small adjustments just
> >>> to make it apply without changing the functionality.
> >> 
> >> I have an updated version of the patch, which I intend to submit soon.
> > 
> > Is it publicly available already ?
> 
> Just started working on it the other day.

I'm working on the same chip, how can we avoid effort duplication ?

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart