From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com (perceval.ideasonboard.com [213.167.242.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 827B86519C for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:54:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.167.242.64 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706532864; cv=none; b=JvZJMX4Uu+odf8xsoovpYqucvd2TKH8lXEblsSBXvT2/uYt6wyItAJ+PrdjoCUSLY6vnl5PCfXQd2+zp3Iw0UTipI9sN4kJtccQZywb71acO0/F0fEyoTjM8n/IbqUG43Ulf16HW6/EZGZ8n9D/00wRW/4J3xGjGwPzcTdlKaPE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706532864; c=relaxed/simple; bh=u3qGhvxkt2BrZxR5CI/0ZU7I9Kr6TdiTnWr3OoxO/d4=; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc: To:Date:Message-ID; b=K/gELxpJ9GMSpOdxL3D7o68adCNIn6LWCNBaOhgR4c1zyQkK2Fu0lNm8z3O72mqJbtpNWIQbKtrAzy3A0mPFE0J1YNBSPjjNVevCpbqBrtHG0WqSFBLmoCZ5nu8j+zmM2ygSqQ3/8LReeo5T6Le5PUzPTO+oZ44mqbdq5wUatUg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ideasonboard.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ideasonboard.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b=R0GesCaT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.167.242.64 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ideasonboard.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ideasonboard.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ideasonboard.com header.i=@ideasonboard.com header.b="R0GesCaT" Received: from pendragon.ideasonboard.com (aztw-30-b2-v4wan-166917-cust845.vm26.cable.virginm.net [82.37.23.78]) by perceval.ideasonboard.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DDDA1F73; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 13:53:03 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ideasonboard.com; s=mail; t=1706532783; bh=u3qGhvxkt2BrZxR5CI/0ZU7I9Kr6TdiTnWr3OoxO/d4=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Cc:To:Date:From; b=R0GesCaTZRkS4pcaZxgU/K2ri9qBeEg7sjut0K+Z/Tt6R+WAeCbWXedeHS3M6DjST VVM2KZ7hL0ECmoNwsGRaJcvaeslgJr60rL2XN08lPFMvNqMegKxKq2EQgHpHQKrHj4 71+hU3TgEgzXM3z4ezAFXIx/FZrLjwI6mRlAJFqU= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <77162309-ed79-42ed-a715-d8a0ce1af56d@redhat.com> References: <0fa07550-80cb-40f2-87c8-23864af33642@redhat.com> <77162309-ed79-42ed-a715-d8a0ce1af56d@redhat.com> Subject: Re: Weird default vblank value in ov5693 From: Kieran Bingham Cc: Linux Media Mailing List To: Hans de Goede , Jacopo Mondi Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:54:18 +0000 Message-ID: <170653285818.2407440.7940034493930024656@ping.linuxembedded.co.uk> User-Agent: alot/0.10 Quoting Hans de Goede (2024-01-29 10:43:33) > Hi, > >=20 > > Would you be interested in reviewing > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/list/?series=3D697777&= state=3D%2A&archive=3Dboth > Documentation: media: camera_sensor: Document blankings handling > >=20 > > and discuss there what the desired behaviour should be ? >=20 > I'm definitely interested in discussing this and in > helping with reviewing the documentation patches, > good timing wrt writing those patches :) >=20 > but Dan already replied in this thread, so lets > keep the discussion in this thread for now ? >=20 > Also I think this will probably make a good agenda > item for the libcamera workshop coming Friday ? Added to the existing Sensor Modes topic that was added by Nicolas -- Kieran