From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from galahad.ideasonboard.com ([185.26.127.97]:36198 "EHLO galahad.ideasonboard.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750725AbdLKTxi (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Dec 2017 14:53:38 -0500 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 v7] uvcvideo: add a metadata device node Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 21:53:39 +0200 Message-ID: <19653172.edRCCjirqM@avalon> In-Reply-To: References: <1510156814-28645-1-git-send-email-g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Guennadi, On Wednesday, 6 December 2017 17:08:14 EET Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Hi Laurent, >=20 > While testing the new patch version, we did introduce a couple of > differences: >=20 > 1. We cannot (easily) reuse .vidioc_querycap() - the metadata node uses > v4l2_fh_open() directly, so, it has a different struct file::private_data > pointer. OK, no problem, it's not a big deal.=B5 > 2. After your video device unification, the order has swapped: now > /dev/video0 is a metadata node and /dev/video1 is a video node. Is that > how you wanted to have this or you don't mind or shall I swap them back? > For now I've swapped them back, I think that would be more appropriate. I agree, that's better, thank you. =2D-=20 Regards, Laurent Pinchart