From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m2JMdMFK028738 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:39:22 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2JMcm0B014107 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:38:49 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:38:32 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Hartmut Hackmann Message-ID: <20080319193832.643bf8a0@gaivota> In-Reply-To: <47E190CF.9050904@t-online.de> References: <47E060EB.5040207@t-online.de> <47E190CF.9050904@t-online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Michael Krufky , Linux and Kernel Video , LInux DVB Subject: Re: [RFC] TDA8290 / TDA827X with LNA: testers wanted List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:16:47 +0100 Hartmut Hackmann wrote: > Hi, Mauro > > Mauro Carvalho Chehab schrieb: > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Hartmut Hackmann wrote: > > > >> Mauro, what's your opinion on this? As far as i know, the broken code > >> is in the upcoming > >> kernel release. The patch is big, is there a chance to commit it to > >> the kernel? > > > > While some fixes are cosmetic (like __func__ change), and others are > > just function reordering, I suspect that the real changes are still too > > big for -rc6. It will probably be nacked. > > > > Yet, it may be worthy to try. > > This was my opinion as well. > Did you notice Michaels reply on this issue? He pointed out that the problem > was introduced by this changeset: > http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/ad6fb7fe6240 : Add support for xc3028-based boards > > If this did not go to Linus yet, we don't have a problem. This also explains > why we don't have bug reports on this. It didn't reach mainstream yet. About the bug report, there's a related bug, on a thread about Avermedia A16D. The issue is that "dev" is NULL but this shouldn't happen (otherwise, all callbacks will fail). On your patch, you're just returning, if dev=NULL, at saa7134 callback function. IMO, the correct would be to print an error message and return. Also, we should discover why dev is being null there (I'll try to identify here - the reason - yet, I can't really test, since the saa7134 boards I have don't need any callback. > > > > > I still need to send a patchset to Linus, after testing compilation > > (unfortunately, I had to postpone, since I need first to free some > > hundreds of Mb on my HD on my /home, to allow kernel compilation). > > Hopefully, I'll have some time tomorrow for doing a "housekeeping". > > > Unfortunately, i deleted you mails describing what went to linux and i don't > have the RC source here :-( You may take a look on master branch on my git tree. I'm about to forward him a series of patches. Hopefully, 2GB free space will be enough for a full kernel compilation. I'll discover soon... Cheers, Mauro -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list