From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]) by www.linuxtv.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JcFnr-0002zv-5G for linux-dvb@linuxtv.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 09:07:11 +0100 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 22so596969fge.25 for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:07:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 09:07:01 +0100 To: Igor Message-ID: <20080320080701.GA7627@gmail.com> References: <20080319222137.GA30672@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: From: Gregoire Favre Cc: linux-dvb@linuxtv.org Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] HVR4000 patch and Latest Multiproto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-dvb-bounces@linuxtv.org Errors-To: linux-dvb-bounces+mchehab=infradead.org@linuxtv.org List-ID: On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 08:57:48AM +0300, Igor wrote: > > That's very strange as it don't seems to have been change on multiproto > > since my last patch the 13 of this month. Or you mean my patch is wrong= ? > > "Working HVR-4000 (as of 2008-03-13) patch for multiproto ?" > > = > > http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2008-March/024487.html > > = > > If my patch is wrong, it's a funny way to tell me... > = > = > does your patch need to use instead the hvr4000-patch from Holger Steinha= us > http://www.linuxtv.org/pipermail/linux-dvb/2008-January/023390.html It's always more or less the same patch, only updated for changes in multiproto. -- = Gr=E9goire FAVRE http://gregoire.favre.googlepages.com http://www.gnupg.o= rg http://picasaweb.google.com/Gregoire.Favre _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb