From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m34Ct1Yp024494 for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:55:01 -0400 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id m34Cskdh029519 for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 08:54:46 -0400 From: Oliver Endriss To: Michael Krufky Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 14:02:12 +0200 References: <1115343012.20080318233620@a-j.ru> <200804040456.57561@orion.escape-edv.de> <47F5AB2A.3020908@linuxtv.org> In-Reply-To: <47F5AB2A.3020908@linuxtv.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804041402.13210@orion.escape-edv.de> Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-dvb@linuxtv.org Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] TT S-1401 problem with kernel 2.6.24 ??? List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: Michael Krufky wrote: > Oliver Endriss wrote: > > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > >>>>> If we should go back to 2.6.23 level, so far nobody seems to have > >>>>> realized a improvement for the LifeView Trio stuff, I'm not against it. > >>>>> > >>>>> The changeset in question to revert is mercurial 6579. > >>>>> > >>>>> If nobody else is interested and no comments, I also don't care anymore. > >>>>> > >>>> (Basically I don't care because I am tired of discussing kernel > >>>> politics.) > >>>> > >>>> Imho a fix should be applied, no matter how many lines it has. > >>>> If that is not possible the offending patch should be reverted in > >>>> 2.6.24.x. > >>>> > >> ... > >> > >> Let me try to reset to a sane state. > >> > >> With the current tree (changesets 6579 and 7186), is there any broken board? If > >> so, what board(s)? > >> > >> Both patches are already applied at mainstream and should be available on > >> 2.6.25. Are those OK for 2.6.25? > >> > >> Is there any missing patch that should be sent to -stable (2.6.24)? If so, what > >> patch? > >> > > > > The point is that 6579 was applied to 2.6.24.x, but 7186 wasn't. > > So TTS_1401 support is broken for the 2.6.24 series. > > > > Imho 7186 _must_ be applied to 2.6.24, no matter how large the patch is. > > > Are you saying that THIS is the patch that needs to be applied to 2.6.24.y ? > > http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/eb6bc7f18024 > > If so, this patch seems fine for -stable. We just have to make sure it > applies correctly, etc. Correct, this is the patch. I did a quick check: It applies to 2.6.24.2 with some hunks. CU Oliver -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- VDR Remote Plugin 0.4.0: http://www.escape-edv.de/endriss/vdr/ ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list