From: Brandon Philips <brandon@ifup.org>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@pengutronix.de>
Cc: v4l-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org, video4linux-list@redhat.com,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc-camera: use a spinlock for videobuffer queue
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 13:17:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080404201726.GA1219@plankton.ifup.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804041541440.5438@axis700.grange>
On 15:46 Fri 04 Apr 2008, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> All drivers should provide a spinlock to be used in videobuf operations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@pengutronix.de>
This looks OK. Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Brandon Philips <bphilips@suse.de>
> ---
>
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Brandon Philips wrote:
>
> > On 21:53 Fri 28 Mar 2008, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> >
> > > OTOH, at least the PXA270 hardware needs a more global protection - to
> > > protect the DMA channel setup. And this is hardware specific. We can just
> > > assume that (imaginary) systems with multiple camera busses will have an
> > > own DMA channel per bus and will allow their concurrent onfiguration...
> > > Maybe we should let the hardware host driver decide on spinlock locality
> > > and just use whatever it provides?
> >
> > I don't know enough about the hardware to comment.
>
> How about this one? Mauro, note: it should be applied after the previous
> patch, introducing soc_camera_host_ops.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/pxa_camera.c b/drivers/media/video/pxa_camera.c
> index 9758f7e..bef3c9c 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/pxa_camera.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/pxa_camera.c
> @@ -803,6 +803,15 @@ static int pxa_camera_querycap(struct soc_camera_host *ici,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static spinlock_t *pxa_camera_spinlock_alloc(struct soc_camera_file *icf)
> +{
> + struct soc_camera_host *ici =
> + to_soc_camera_host(icf->icd->dev.parent);
> + struct pxa_camera_dev *pcdev = ici->priv;
> +
> + return &pcdev->lock;
> +}
> +
> static struct soc_camera_host_ops pxa_soc_camera_host_ops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .add = pxa_camera_add_device,
> @@ -814,6 +823,7 @@ static struct soc_camera_host_ops pxa_soc_camera_host_ops = {
> .querycap = pxa_camera_querycap,
> .try_bus_param = pxa_camera_try_bus_param,
> .set_bus_param = pxa_camera_set_bus_param,
> + .spinlock_alloc = pxa_camera_spinlock_alloc,
> };
>
> /* Should be allocated dynamically too, but we have only one. */
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/soc_camera.c b/drivers/media/video/soc_camera.c
> index 43c8110..1e92157 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/soc_camera.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/soc_camera.c
> @@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ static int soc_camera_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> struct soc_camera_device *icd;
> struct soc_camera_host *ici;
> struct soc_camera_file *icf;
> + spinlock_t *lock;
> int ret;
>
> icf = vmalloc(sizeof(*icf));
> @@ -209,10 +210,16 @@ static int soc_camera_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> goto emgi;
> }
>
> - icd->use_count++;
> -
> icf->icd = icd;
>
> + icf->lock = ici->ops->spinlock_alloc(icf);
> + if (!icf->lock) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto esla;
> + }
> +
> + icd->use_count++;
> +
> /* Now we really have to activate the camera */
> if (icd->use_count == 1) {
> ret = ici->ops->add(icd);
> @@ -229,8 +236,8 @@ static int soc_camera_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> dev_dbg(&icd->dev, "camera device open\n");
>
> /* We must pass NULL as dev pointer, then all pci_* dma operations
> - * transform to normal dma_* ones. Do we need an irqlock? */
> - videobuf_queue_sg_init(&icf->vb_vidq, ici->vbq_ops, NULL, NULL,
> + * transform to normal dma_* ones. */
> + videobuf_queue_sg_init(&icf->vb_vidq, ici->vbq_ops, NULL, icf->lock,
> V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE, V4L2_FIELD_NONE,
> ici->msize, icd);
>
> @@ -238,6 +245,11 @@ static int soc_camera_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>
> /* All errors are entered with the video_lock held */
> eiciadd:
> + lock = icf->lock;
> + icf->lock = NULL;
> + if (ici->ops->spinlock_free)
> + ici->ops->spinlock_free(lock);
> +esla:
> module_put(ici->ops->owner);
> emgi:
> module_put(icd->ops->owner);
> @@ -253,16 +265,20 @@ static int soc_camera_close(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> struct soc_camera_device *icd = icf->icd;
> struct soc_camera_host *ici = to_soc_camera_host(icd->dev.parent);
> struct video_device *vdev = icd->vdev;
> + spinlock_t *lock = icf->lock;
>
> mutex_lock(&video_lock);
> icd->use_count--;
> if (!icd->use_count)
> ici->ops->remove(icd);
> + icf->lock = NULL;
> + if (ici->ops->spinlock_free)
> + ici->ops->spinlock_free(lock);
> module_put(icd->ops->owner);
> module_put(ici->ops->owner);
> mutex_unlock(&video_lock);
>
> - vfree(file->private_data);
> + vfree(icf);
>
> dev_dbg(vdev->dev, "camera device close\n");
>
> @@ -762,6 +778,21 @@ static void dummy_release(struct device *dev)
> {
> }
>
> +static spinlock_t *spinlock_alloc(struct soc_camera_file *icf)
> +{
> + spinlock_t *lock = kmalloc(sizeof(spinlock_t), GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + if (lock)
> + spin_lock_init(lock);
> +
> + return lock;
> +}
> +
> +static void spinlock_free(spinlock_t *lock)
> +{
> + kfree(lock);
> +}
> +
> int soc_camera_host_register(struct soc_camera_host *ici)
> {
> int ret;
> @@ -792,6 +823,11 @@ int soc_camera_host_register(struct soc_camera_host *ici)
> if (ret)
> goto edevr;
>
> + if (!ici->ops->spinlock_alloc) {
> + ici->ops->spinlock_alloc = spinlock_alloc;
> + ici->ops->spinlock_free = spinlock_free;
> + }
> +
> scan_add_host(ici);
>
> return 0;
> diff --git a/include/media/soc_camera.h b/include/media/soc_camera.h
> index 80e1193..6a8c8be 100644
> --- a/include/media/soc_camera.h
> +++ b/include/media/soc_camera.h
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ struct soc_camera_device {
> struct soc_camera_file {
> struct soc_camera_device *icd;
> struct videobuf_queue vb_vidq;
> + spinlock_t *lock;
> };
>
> struct soc_camera_host {
> @@ -73,6 +74,8 @@ struct soc_camera_host_ops {
> int (*try_bus_param)(struct soc_camera_device *, __u32);
> int (*set_bus_param)(struct soc_camera_device *, __u32);
> unsigned int (*poll)(struct file *, poll_table *);
> + spinlock_t* (*spinlock_alloc)(struct soc_camera_file *);
> + void (*spinlock_free)(spinlock_t *);
> };
>
> struct soc_camera_link {
--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-04 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-28 10:18 [PATCH 0 of 9] videobuf fixes Brandon Philips
2008-03-28 10:18 ` [PATCH 1 of 9] soc_camera: Introduce a spinlock for use with videobuf Brandon Philips
2008-03-28 20:53 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-03-29 3:59 ` Brandon Philips
2008-04-04 13:46 ` [PATCH] soc-camera: use a spinlock for videobuffer queue Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-04-04 20:17 ` Brandon Philips [this message]
2008-03-28 10:18 ` [PATCH 2 of 9] videobuf: Require spinlocks for all videobuf users Brandon Philips
2008-03-28 10:18 ` [PATCH 3 of 9] videobuf: Wakeup queues after changing the state to ERROR Brandon Philips
2008-03-28 10:18 ` [PATCH 4 of 9] videobuf: Simplify videobuf_waiton logic and possibly avoid missed wakeup Brandon Philips
2008-03-28 10:18 ` [PATCH 5 of 9] videobuf-vmalloc.c: Remove buf_release from videobuf_vm_close Brandon Philips
2008-03-28 10:18 ` [PATCH 6 of 9] videobuf-vmalloc.c: Fix hack of postponing mmap on remap failure Brandon Philips
[not found] ` <20080405131236.7c083554@gaivota>
[not found] ` <20080406080011.GA3596@plankton.ifup.org>
[not found] ` <20080407183226.703217fc@gaivota>
[not found] ` <20080408152238.GA8438@plankton.public.utexas.edu>
2008-04-08 18:40 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
[not found] ` <c8b4dbe10804081306xb1e8f91q64d1e6d18d3d2531@mail.gmail.com>
2008-04-08 20:50 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
[not found] ` <c8b4dbe10804090626l6b2b10d9p1c22e02dfe2850fe@mail.gmail.com>
2008-04-09 20:42 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
[not found] ` <20080408204514.GA6844@plankton.public.utexas.edu>
2008-04-08 21:37 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
[not found] ` <20080415021558.GA22068@plankton.ifup.org>
2008-04-15 14:10 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-03-28 10:18 ` [PATCH 7 of 9] vivi: Simplify the vivi driver and avoid deadlocks Brandon Philips
2008-03-28 18:34 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-03-29 5:35 ` Brandon Philips
2008-03-31 19:35 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-03-28 10:18 ` [PATCH 8 of 9] videobuf: Avoid deadlock with QBUF and bring up to spec for empty queue Brandon Philips
2008-03-28 10:18 ` [PATCH 9 of 9] videobuf-dma-sg.c: Avoid NULL dereference and add comment about backwards compatibility Brandon Philips
2008-03-28 19:09 ` [PATCH 0 of 9] videobuf fixes Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-03-29 5:25 ` Brandon Philips
2008-03-29 22:49 ` Vanessa Ezekowitz
2008-03-31 18:35 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-03-31 19:26 ` Brandon Philips
2008-03-31 21:31 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-04-01 3:11 ` Brandon Philips
2008-04-01 20:49 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-04-02 18:54 ` Brandon Philips
2008-04-02 20:06 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-04-02 18:56 ` Brandon Philips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080404201726.GA1219@plankton.ifup.org \
--to=brandon@ifup.org \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@pengutronix.de \
--cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
--cc=v4l-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org \
--cc=video4linux-list@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox