From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m4NJBjHc014484 for ; Fri, 23 May 2008 15:11:45 -0400 Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk [81.2.110.250]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4NJBXgm019145 for ; Fri, 23 May 2008 15:11:33 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 19:58:22 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: corbet@lwn.net (Jonathan Corbet) Message-ID: <20080523195822.5c6fe260@core> In-Reply-To: <15168.1211558968@vena.lwn.net> References: <20080523163956.6e93746c@core> <15168.1211558968@vena.lwn.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] video4linux: Push down the BKL List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: > BTW, drop me a pointer if you'd like this series pulled into the > ever-growing bkl-removal tree. Its a single big patch right now and I need to split it up further and tidy it, plus see what the maintainers take and think. Once I've done that I'd be in favour of actually patching ->ioctl out of the bkl-removal tree and letting people fix the other architectures by neccessity ;) Alan -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list