From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from as-10.de ([212.112.241.2] helo=mail.as-10.de) by www.linuxtv.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KipyM-00011n-KG for linux-dvb@linuxtv.org; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:29:31 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.as-10.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F8A33A77B for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:28:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.as-10.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (as-10.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y18XFNBnmrV2 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:28:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from halim.local (p54AE70F2.dip.t-dialin.net [84.174.112.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: web11p28) by mail.as-10.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5922733A74B for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:28:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:28:57 +0200 From: Halim Sahin To: linux-dvb@linuxtv.org Message-ID: <20080925122857.GA7282@halim.local> References: <200809241922.16748@orion.escape-edv.de> <1222306125.3323.80.camel@pc10.localdom.local> <200809251254.59680@orion.escape-edv.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200809251254.59680@orion.escape-edv.de> Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] [vdr] [v4l-dvb-maintainer] [Wanted] dvb-ttpci maintainer Reply-To: VDR Mailing List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-dvb-bounces@linuxtv.org Errors-To: linux-dvb-bounces+mchehab=infradead.org@linuxtv.org List-ID: Hi, On Do, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:54:58 +0200, Oliver Endriss wrote: > There are basic democratic rules which must be followed in a community: > > (1) Make a proposal Yes We have multiproto, since 2006. > (2) Discuss the proposal Was done since 2006 > (3) Finally, _after_ the discussion: A poll to find a decision. Great thing. Why was multiproto not merged after your code review november 2007???? I thing Manu wanted to do the s2 stuff himself and did not accept any community help. Yes I read most of the old mails from last year. In most cases Manu wrote that multiproto is not ready. The fact is, that many people are using (not ready multiproto stuff) since two years. The basic democratic rules should integrate the community and not only two multiproto developers. Any way, my compromise for this problem is: Manu Abraham and Steven Toth should work on one of the API's (together) and then decide which is the better solution for the new upcoming standards! The current situation is not acceptable for endusers / other developers!!!! Please don't stop your great work on ttpci Oliver. Regards Halim _______________________________________________ vdr mailing list vdr@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vdr _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb