From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>
Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org,
linuxkernel@lanrules.de
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11776] New: Regression: Hardware working with old stock gspca module fails with 2.6.27 module
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:55:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081020165537.9bb9ae8a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-11776-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
gspca doesn't seem to have a MAINTAINERS record. Or it is entered
under something unobvious so my search failed?
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11776
>
> Summary: Regression: Hardware working with old stock gspca module
> fails with 2.6.27 module
> Product: Drivers
> Version: 2.5
> KernelVersion: 2.6.27
> Platform: All
> OS/Version: Linux
> Tree: Mainline
> Status: NEW
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P1
> Component: Other
> AssignedTo: drivers_other@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
> ReportedBy: linuxkernel@lanrules.de
>
>
> Latest working kernel version: 2.6.26.5
> Earliest failing kernel version: 2.6.27
> Distribution: ArchLinux
> Hardware Environment: i686 Lenovo T16P laptop, Lenovo USB 2.0 Webcam (40Y8519)
> Problem Description:
> I used gspca-1.0 from mxhaard.free.fr as a driver for my webcam. The driver
> worked. gspca is now included in the mainline kernel. The driver doesn't work
> anymore. The camera is detected, but the image is not shown. Instead, colorful
> noise is shown.
>
> This is the information about the webcam given by the old gspca module, still
> working with 2.6.26:
> Camera found: lenovo MI1310_SOC
> Bridge found: VC0323
> StreamId: JPEG Camera
> quality 7 autoexpo 1 Timeframe 0 lightfreq 50
> Available Resolutions width 640 heigth 480 native
> Available Resolutions width 352 heigth 288 native
> Available Resolutions width 320 heigth 240 native *
> Available Resolutions width 176 heigth 144 native
> Available Resolutions width 160 heigth 120 native
> unable to probe size !!
>
> I don't see any significant difference in the output of the module included in
> 2.6.27. Tell me how I can provide more useful information.
>
--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
next parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-20 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-11776-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2008-10-20 23:55 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-10-21 9:10 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 11776] New: Regression: Hardware working with old stock gspca module fails with 2.6.27 module Hans de Goede
2008-10-21 11:15 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081020165537.9bb9ae8a.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxkernel@lanrules.de \
--cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
--cc=moinejf@free.fr \
--cc=video4linux-list@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox