From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mALNe1J9008553 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:40:01 -0500 Received: from mk-outboundfilter-5.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-outboundfilter-5.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.1]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mALNdiIE001249 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:39:44 -0500 From: Adam Baker To: sqcam-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:39:42 +0000 References: <200811212157.21254.linux@baker-net.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <200811212157.21254.linux@baker-net.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200811212339.42492.linux@baker-net.org.uk> Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com, kilgota@banach.math.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [sqcam-devel] Advice wanted on producing an in kernel sq905 driver List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: On Friday 21 November 2008, Adam Baker wrote: > There is a patch for libusb at > http://osdir.com/ml/lib.libusb.devel.general/2007-04/msg00239.html to > implemnt attach which the relevant maintainer claimed he had applied but > doesn't appear to exist in libusb svn. I'll raise the issue on the Further investigation reveals that the reason this patch hasn't been applied is because libusb-0.1 is in bug fixes only mode while a new libusb variant is being developed. It did get applied to a previous development branch but that branch got killed. I've asked the question anyway. Adam -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list