From: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
To: kilgota@banach.math.auburn.edu
Cc: Adam Baker <linux@baker-net.org.uk>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for sq905 based cameras to gspca
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:23:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090203202307.0ae074ec@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0902031302060.1882@banach.math.auburn.edu>
On Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:15:58 -0600 (CST)
kilgota@banach.math.auburn.edu wrote:
> > Why is there 2 sq905 processes?
>
> I of course do not fully understand why there are two such processes.
> However, I would suspect that [sq905/0] is running on processor 0 and
> [sq905/1] is running on processor 1. As I remember, there is only one
> [sq905] process which runs on a single-core machine.
Indeed, the problem is there! You must have only one process reading the
webcam! I do not see how this can work with these 2 processes...
--
Ken ar c'hentan | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-03 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-19 23:22 [PATCH] Add support for sq905 based cameras to gspca Adam Baker
2009-01-20 3:33 ` Alexey Klimov
2009-01-21 17:20 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2009-01-21 19:10 ` kilgota
2009-01-22 4:17 ` Why not to try to combine sq905 and sq kilgota
[not found] ` <200901272101.27451.linux@baker-net.org.uk>
[not found] ` <alpine.LNX.2.00.0901271543560.21122@banach.math.auburn.edu>
[not found] ` <200901272228.42610.linux@baker-net.org.uk>
[not found] ` <20090128113540.25536301@free.fr>
[not found] ` <alpine.LNX.2.00.0901281554500.22748@banach.math.auburn.edu>
[not found] ` <20090131203650.36369153@free.fr>
[not found] ` <alpine.LNX.2.00.0902022032230.1080@banach.math.auburn.edu>
2009-02-03 9:39 ` [PATCH] Add support for sq905 based cameras to gspca Jean-Francois Moine
2009-02-03 17:30 ` kilgota
2009-02-03 18:21 ` kilgota
2009-02-03 18:13 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2009-02-03 19:15 ` kilgota
2009-02-03 19:23 ` Jean-Francois Moine [this message]
2009-02-03 19:54 ` kilgota
2009-02-03 19:47 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2009-02-03 19:59 ` Alan Stern
2009-02-03 22:23 ` kilgota
2009-02-04 2:02 ` Alan Stern
2009-02-04 3:12 ` kilgota
2009-02-03 22:09 ` Adam Baker
2009-02-03 22:28 ` kilgota
2009-02-04 1:59 ` Alan Stern
2009-02-04 2:33 ` Andy Walls
2009-02-04 21:38 ` Adam Baker
2009-02-04 22:31 ` kilgota
2009-02-04 22:34 ` Adam Baker
2009-02-04 22:53 ` kilgota
2009-02-04 23:09 ` kilgota
2009-02-03 19:42 ` kilgota
2009-02-03 19:53 ` Alan Stern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090203202307.0ae074ec@free.fr \
--to=moinejf@free.fr \
--cc=kilgota@banach.math.auburn.edu \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@baker-net.org.uk \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox