From: Ales Jurik <ajurik@quick.cz>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:12:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200902241412.32682.ajurik@quick.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200902221115.01464.hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
On Sunday 22 of February 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually
> determine someone's opinion.
>
> So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me
> with your yes/no answer and (optional but welcome) a short explanation to
> your standpoint. It doesn't matter if you are a user or developer, I'd like
> to see your opinion regardless.
>
> Please DO NOT reply to the replies, I'll summarize the results in a week's
> time and then we can discuss it further.
>
> Should we drop support for kernels <2.6.22 in our v4l-dvb repository?
>
> _: Yes
> _: No
>
Yes
> Optional question:
>
> Why:
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-24 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-22 10:15 POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22 Hans Verkuil
2009-02-22 19:12 ` CityK
2009-02-22 23:52 ` Andy Walls
2009-02-23 4:28 ` [Bulk] " CityK
2009-02-22 22:56 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-02-22 23:27 ` kilgota
2009-02-23 1:13 ` hermann pitton
2009-02-23 6:41 ` Robert Golding
2009-02-23 8:32 ` VDR User
2009-02-23 12:26 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-02-23 14:54 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-02-23 14:48 ` Douglas Schilling Landgraf
2009-02-23 14:53 ` David Ellingsworth
2009-02-24 5:04 ` Trent Piepho
2009-02-24 7:25 ` Hans Verkuil
2009-02-24 13:12 ` Ales Jurik [this message]
2009-02-24 20:19 ` Hans Verkuil
2009-02-24 20:43 ` Jonathan Johnson
2009-02-25 0:06 ` Markus Rechberger
2009-02-25 3:24 ` Markus Rechberger
2009-02-25 0:01 ` Simeon Simeonov
2009-02-24 20:40 ` Rudy Zijlstra
2009-02-24 21:02 ` Michael Krufky
2009-02-24 23:37 ` hermann pitton
2009-02-25 0:52 ` Ant
2009-02-25 8:23 ` Simon Kenyon
2009-02-25 12:31 ` Simon Kenyon
2009-02-25 17:58 ` wk
2009-02-25 18:19 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2009-02-25 19:10 ` Hans Werner
2009-02-25 19:32 ` Lars Hanisch
2009-02-26 5:26 ` Mike Isely
2009-02-27 2:25 ` Magnus Damm
2009-03-01 19:51 ` Tobias Stoeber
2009-03-01 21:50 ` Adrian Pardini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-02-23 1:24 sonofzev
2009-02-23 13:49 Jean Delvare
2009-02-23 13:54 ` Trent Piepho
2009-02-24 11:56 ` John Pilkington
2009-02-24 20:41 ` Simon Kenyon
[not found] ` <49A3DDFC.6010608@tesco.net>
2009-02-24 13:15 ` Jean Delvare
2009-02-24 14:34 ` John Pilkington
2009-02-23 14:09 Hans Verkuil
2009-02-25 8:35 Hans Verkuil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200902241412.32682.ajurik@quick.cz \
--to=ajurik@quick.cz \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox