public inbox for linux-media@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: John Pilkington <J.Pilk@tesco.net>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:15:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090224141540.4b8a765f@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49A3DDFC.6010608@tesco.net>

Hi John,

(re-adding linux-media on Cc as I doubt you dropped it on purpose...)

On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:46:04 +0000, John Pilkington wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
> 
> > * Enterprise-class distributions (RHEL, SLED) are not the right target
> >   for the v4l-dvb repository, so we don't care which kernels these are
> >   running.
> 
> I think you should be aware that the mythtv and ATrpms communities 
> include a significant number of people who have chosen to use the 
> CentOS_5 series in the hope of getting systems that do not need to be 
> reinstalled every few months.  I hope you won't disappoint them.

CentOS is a parasite, if it dies I can't care less. CentOS users have
the recurrent habit to expect professional support from the community
without giving anything in return. Even worse: they consider that
running an antediluvian OS is the default and they don't understand why
upstream developers won't help them.

You said it yourself: they expect to be able to keep the same system
for a long time. This is a service you normally get from Red Hat or
Novell, and you pay for it. This is something the community is
generally not willing to offer for free, because it is not fun.

If the MythTV community cares that much about the v4l-dvb tree, they are
free to fork it right before support for kernel 2.6.18 is dropped, and
maintain that copy themselves. But their model is broken to start with:
sticking to a several-year-old kernel and OS, and OTOH picking critical
(for their use case) kernel drivers from a development tree which
evolves continuously by definition, makes little sense. Then again, I
would be happy to keep support for them if the cost wasn't too high.
But right now, the cost _is_ too high.

Your view of community distributions is a bit too negative BTW. You
don't need to go to the extreme CentOS_5 is to not have to reinstall
every few months. openSUSE distributions are maintained for 2 years for
example.

-- 
Jean Delvare

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-24 13:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-23 13:49 POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels < 2.6.22 Jean Delvare
2009-02-23 13:54 ` Trent Piepho
2009-02-24 11:56 ` John Pilkington
2009-02-24 20:41   ` Simon Kenyon
     [not found] ` <49A3DDFC.6010608@tesco.net>
2009-02-24 13:15   ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2009-02-24 14:34     ` John Pilkington
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-02-25  8:35 Hans Verkuil
2009-02-23 14:09 Hans Verkuil
2009-02-23  1:24 sonofzev
2009-02-22 10:15 Hans Verkuil
2009-02-22 19:12 ` CityK
2009-02-22 23:52   ` Andy Walls
2009-02-22 22:56 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-02-22 23:27 ` kilgota
2009-02-23  1:13 ` hermann pitton
2009-02-23  6:41 ` Robert Golding
2009-02-23  8:32 ` VDR User
2009-02-23 12:26 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-02-23 14:54   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-02-23 14:48 ` Douglas Schilling Landgraf
2009-02-23 14:53 ` David Ellingsworth
2009-02-24  5:04   ` Trent Piepho
2009-02-24  7:25     ` Hans Verkuil
2009-02-24 13:12 ` Ales Jurik
2009-02-24 20:19 ` Hans Verkuil
2009-02-24 20:43   ` Jonathan Johnson
2009-02-25  0:06     ` Markus Rechberger
2009-02-25  3:24       ` Markus Rechberger
2009-02-25  0:01   ` Simeon Simeonov
2009-02-24 20:40 ` Rudy Zijlstra
2009-02-24 21:02 ` Michael Krufky
2009-02-24 23:37   ` hermann pitton
2009-02-25  0:52 ` Ant
2009-02-25  8:23 ` Simon Kenyon
2009-02-25 12:31   ` Simon Kenyon
2009-02-25 17:58 ` wk
2009-02-25 18:19   ` Jean-Francois Moine
2009-02-25 19:10   ` Hans Werner
2009-02-25 19:32 ` Lars Hanisch
2009-02-26  5:26 ` Mike Isely
2009-02-27  2:25 ` Magnus Damm
2009-03-01 19:51 ` Tobias Stoeber
2009-03-01 21:50 ` Adrian Pardini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090224141540.4b8a765f@hyperion.delvare \
    --to=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=J.Pilk@tesco.net \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox