From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from tichy.grunau.be ([85.131.189.73]:52583 "EHLO tichy.grunau.be" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750840AbZDALOI (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2009 07:14:08 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 13:13:41 +0200 From: Janne Grunau To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Mike Isely , isely@isely.net, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5 of 8] pvrusb2: use usb_interface.dev for v4l2_device_register Message-ID: <20090401111341.GA26440@aniel> References: <20090329145908.GF17855@aniel> <20090401063718.69e28bd2@caramujo.chehab.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090401063718.69e28bd2@caramujo.chehab.org> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 06:37:18AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:02:16 -0500 (CDT) > Mike Isely wrote: > > > > > This patch will not at all impact the operation of the pvrusb2 driver, > > and if associating with the USB interface's device node is preferred > > then I'm fine with it. > > > > Acked-by: Mike Isely Thanks, added. > > Mauro: Is this series going to be pulled into v4l-dvb or shall I just > > bring this one specific change into my pvrusb2 repo? Is there any > > reason not to pull it? > > I'll take care on it on the next time I'll apply patchwork patches. You don't need to. My plan was to send a pull request once I have enough feedback. I should have said that in the intro mail. > I suspect > that Janne preferred to send via email for people to better analyse the impacts. Yes, exactly. Janne