From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from 124x34x33x190.ap124.ftth.ucom.ne.jp ([124.34.33.190]:55357 "EHLO master.linux-sh.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753927AbZFIN1N (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 09:27:13 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:26:37 +0900 From: Paul Mundt To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: Linux Media Mailing List , Hans Verkuil , Magnus Damm , Robert Jarzmik , Darius Augulis Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10 v2] soc-camera conversions Message-ID: <20090609132637.GB18528@linux-sh.org> References: <20090519030536.GA20195@linux-sh.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 09:19:50PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Tue, 19 May 2009, Paul Mundt wrote: > > > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 07:18:45PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > this is the next round of soc-camera conversions. Run-tested on i.MX31, > > > PXA270, SH7722, compile-tested only for i.MX1. It should have been a > > > "straight-forward" port of the previous version to a more current tree, > > > but then I started converting soc_camera_platform, and things became a bit > > > more complex... As a bonus, now soc-camera can handle not only i2c > > > subdevices, and we can even drop the CONFIG_I2C dependency again. I'll > > > also upload a comlpete stack somewhere a bit later, for example for those, > > > wishing to test it on i.MX31, otherwise the series will not apply cleanly. > > > > > > I'd like to push the first 8 of them asap, 9 and 10 will still have to be > > > reworked > > > > > > Paul, I put you on "cc" on all patches, because, unfortunately, several of > > > them affect arch/sh. But I'll mention it explicitly in each such patch. > > > > > Looks ok to me, there shouldn't be any problems with taking these all > > through the v4l tree. Feel free to add my Acked-by if you like. I guess > > we will find out in -next if there are any conflicts or not :-) > > Yes, can do this, thanks, but first these 3 patches (including Magnus' > ack) have to be applied to sh: > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg05223.html > which in turn depend on > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg04724.html > and the latter one is already in the next tree. Would you like me to also > merge and pull the above three patches via v4l or would you be applying > them yourself? > I can take care of them once the dependent patch is merged.