public inbox for linux-media@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Cc: v4l-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
	"Udo A. Steinberg" <udo@hypervisor.org>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] 2.6.30: missing audio device in bttv
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:04:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090612100409.04bb0fe5@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200906120118.20700.hverkuil@xs4all.nl>

On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 01:18:20 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Friday 12 June 2009 01:07:46 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > I suspect that we'll need to work with the initialization order after the new
> > i2c binding model to avoid such troubles.
> > 
> > I remember that we had a similar issue with alsa and saa7134. At the end, Linus [1]
> > had to do add this, as a quick hack (unfortunately, it is still there - it
> > seems that alsa guys forgot about that issue):
> > 
> > late_initcall(saa7134_alsa_init);
> > 
> > On that time, he suggested the usage of subsys_initcall() for alsa. I suspect
> > that we'll need to do the same for I2C and for V4L core. I'm not sure what
> > would be the alternative to be done with i2c ancillary drivers.
> > 
> > Maybe one alternative would be to use fs_initcall, that seems to be already
> > used by some non-fs related calls, like cpu governor [2].
> 
> As long as the i2c modules come first there shouldn't be any problem. That's
> pretty easy to arrange. So the i2c core inits first, then i2c drivers, then
> v4l2 drivers. That's the proper order.

This is already what we have in 2.6.30 as far as I can see.

> The ir-kbd-i2c module needed to be after the v4l2 modules since that still
> relies on autoprobing. If it comes first, then it seems to mess up tveeprom
> for some reason. Once ir-kbd-i2c no longer does autoprobing, then it probably
> should move back to the other i2c modules.

Hopefully this will happen in the next few days :)

-- 
Jean Delvare

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-12  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-11 20:14 2.6.30: missing audio device in bttv Udo A. Steinberg
2009-06-11 20:18 ` [v4l-dvb-maintainer] " Hans Verkuil
2009-06-11 20:22   ` Hans Verkuil
2009-06-11 22:20     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-06-11 22:26       ` Hans Verkuil
2009-06-11 23:07         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2009-06-11 23:18           ` Hans Verkuil
2009-06-12  8:04             ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2009-06-11 21:38   ` Udo A. Steinberg
2009-06-11 21:46     ` Hans Verkuil
2009-06-11 22:35       ` Udo A. Steinberg
2009-06-11 23:01         ` Hans Verkuil
2009-06-12  0:00           ` Udo A. Steinberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090612100409.04bb0fe5@hyperion.delvare \
    --to=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
    --cc=udo@hypervisor.org \
    --cc=v4l-dvb-maintainer@linuxtv.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox