From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:1201 "EHLO mail.muc.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932979AbZIDJBI (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Sep 2009 05:01:08 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:32:56 +0200 From: Harald Milz To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-dvb@linuxtv.org Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] diseqc 2.0 on stb0899 / pctv452e (TT S2-3xxx and the likes) Message-ID: <20090904083256.GC7618@seneca.muc.de> References: <4A7F3EE9.3080506@gangkast.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A7F3EE9.3080506@gangkast.nl> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 11:26:01PM +0200, Martijn wrote: > When I go through the s2-liplianin dvb drivers I noticed the DiSEqC 2.0 > freq marker in the stb0899_priv.h header file. Also according to the > STB0899 datasheet DiSEqC 2.0 is supported. Does this mean that the pctv452e > driver does not implement the 2.0 specifications? I have seen the S2-3650 > work through a DiSEqC 1.0 switch without any problems. > Does anyone have an idea as far as this matter? I'd like to use 2 or 3 S2-36xx parts with a Quad monoblock LNB which in principle contains a DiSEqC switch. Anything to watch out for? Am I looking for an LNB that talks DiSEqC 1.0? -- If all the world's economists were laid end to end, we wouldn't reach a conclusion. -- William Baumol