From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:47128 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750821Ab0CFQMa (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Mar 2010 11:12:30 -0500 Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 08:12:51 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Jean Delvare Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linuxtv-commits-bounces@linuxtv.org, linuxtv-commits@linuxtv.org, "Eric W.Biederman" Subject: Re: [git:v4l-dvb/master] sysfs: sysfs_sd_setattr set iattrs unconditionally Message-ID: <20100306161251.GA23287@suse.de> References: <20100306170655.03d97556@hyperion.delvare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100306170655.03d97556@hyperion.delvare> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 05:06:55PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > Err, what's happening here? I can't see any chmod call in any V4L or DVB > driver, so why would this patch matter there? And we will get this fix > through Linus' tree anyway, so why bother at all? I'm puzzled. I'm confused too, I got a bunch of these, for patches that seem to be in Linus's tree already. Did a script go haywire? greg k-h