From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@wp.pl>, LMML <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cx88 remote control event device
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 20:09:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100331200938.7bd49eee@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BB38A7D.7080702@redhat.com>
Hi Mauro,
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:46:37 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Hi Andrzej,
> >
> > Last year, you submitted a fix for the cx88 remote control not behaving
> > properly on some cards. The fix works fine for me and lets me use my
> > remote control, and I am very grateful for this.
> >
> > However, I have noticed (using powertop) that the cx88 driver is waking
> > up the kernel 1250 times per second to handle the remote control. I
> > understand that it is needed for proper operation when the remote
> > control is in use. What I do not understand is why it still happens
> > when nobody uses the remote control. Even when no application has the
> > event device node opened, polling still happens.
> >
> > Can't we have the cx88 driver poll the remote control only when the
> > device node is opened? I believe this would save some power by allowing
> > the CPU to stay in higher C states.
>
> The IR can be used even when nobody is opening the /dev/video device, as
> it is an input device that can be used to control other things, including
> the start of the video application.
>
> That's said, it makes sense to only enable the polling when the /dev/input/event
> device is opened.
Sorry for not being clear originally; this is exactly what I meant.
> Btw, the same polling logic is also present on bttv and saa7134 drivers.
>
> As I'm doing a large IR rework, with the addition of the IR core subsystem,
> and the patch for handing the open/close is very simple, I've already wrote
> a patch for saa7134, on my IR tree:
> http://git.linuxtv.org/mchehab/ir.git?a=commitdiff;h=2b1d3acdb48266f05b82923b8db06e6c7ada0c72
>
> The change itself is very simple, although I've added some additional checks
> to avoid the risk of having an IRQ while IR is disabled.
Looks very good, nice to see someone is already working on the problem.
> I have one cx88 board on my IR test machine (although I need to find the IR sensor for the
> board I'm using there). If I find one that works, I'll try later to write a similar
> code to cx88.
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-31 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-31 11:00 cx88 remote control event device Jean Delvare
2010-03-31 17:46 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-03-31 18:03 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2010-03-31 18:09 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2010-03-31 19:20 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100331200938.7bd49eee@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=andrzej.hajda@wp.pl \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox