From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
To: matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@free.fr>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix dvb frontend lockup
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 21:07:26 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100503210726.66a41c01@pedra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BAE810A.6030405@free.fr>
Hi Matthieu,
Em Sat, 27 Mar 2010 23:04:58 +0100
matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@free.fr> escreveu:
> Etiquetas: NonJunk, unknown-1
> From: matthieu castet <castet.matthieu@free.fr>
> To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH] fix dvb frontend lockup
> Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 23:04:58 +0100
> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090823 SeaMonkey/1.1.18
>
> matthieu castet a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > With my current kernel (2.6.32), if my dvb device is removed while in
> > use, I got [1].
> >
> > After checking the source code, the problem seems to happen also in
> > master :
> >
> > If there are users (for example users == -2) :
> > - dvb_unregister_frontend :
> > - stop kernel thread with dvb_frontend_stop :
> > - fepriv->exit = 1;
> > - thread loop catch stop event and break while loop
> > - fepriv->thread = NULL; and fepriv->exit = 0;
> > - dvb_unregister_frontend wait on "fepriv->dvbdev->wait_queue" that
> > fepriv->dvbdev->users==-1.
> > The user finish :
> > - dvb_frontend_release - set users to -1
> > - don't wait wait_queue because fepriv->exit != 1
> >
> > => dvb_unregister_frontend never exit the wait queue.
> >
> >
> > Matthieu
> >
> >
> > [ 4920.484047] khubd D c2008000 0 198 2 0x00000000
> > [ 4920.484056] f64c8000 00000046 00000000 c2008000 00000004 c13fa000
> > c13fa000 f
> > 64c8000
> > [ 4920.484066] f64c81bc c2008000 00000000 d9d9dce6 00000452 00000001
> > f64c8000 c
> > 102daad
> > [ 4920.484075] 00100100 f64c81bc 00000286 f0a7ccc0 f0913404 f0cba404
> > f644de58 f
> > 092b0a8
> > [ 4920.484084] Call Trace:
> > [ 4920.484102] [<c102daad>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x8
> > [ 4920.484147] [<f8cb09e1>] ? dvb_unregister_frontend+0x95/0xcc [dvb_core]
> > [ 4920.484157] [<c1044412>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2d
> > [ 4920.484168] [<f8dd1af2>] ? dvb_usb_adapter_frontend_exit+0x12/0x21
> > [dvb_usb]
> > [ 4920.484176] [<f8dd12f1>] ? dvb_usb_exit+0x26/0x88 [dvb_usb]
> > [ 4920.484184] [<f8dd138d>] ? dvb_usb_device_exit+0x3a/0x4a [dvb_usb]
> > [ 4920.484217] [<f7fe1b08>] ? usb_unbind_interface+0x3f/0xb4 [usbcore]
> > [ 4920.484227] [<c11a4178>] ? __device_release_driver+0x74/0xb7
> > [ 4920.484233] [<c11a4247>] ? device_release_driver+0x15/0x1e
> > [ 4920.484243] [<c11a3a33>] ? bus_remove_device+0x6e/0x87
> > [ 4920.484249] [<c11a26d6>] ? device_del+0xfa/0x152
> > [ 4920.484264] [<f7fdf609>] ? usb_disable_device+0x59/0xb9 [usbcore]
> > [ 4920.484279] [<f7fdb9ee>] ? usb_disconnect+0x70/0xdc [usbcore]
> > [ 4920.484294] [<f7fdc728>] ? hub_thread+0x521/0xe1d [usbcore]
> > [ 4920.484301] [<c1044412>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2d
> > [ 4920.484316] [<f7fdc207>] ? hub_thread+0x0/0xe1d [usbcore]
> > [ 4920.484321] [<c10441e0>] ? kthread+0x61/0x66
> > [ 4920.484327] [<c104417f>] ? kthread+0x0/0x66
> > [ 4920.484336] [<c1003d47>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
> >
> Here a patch that fix the issue
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthieu CASTET <castet.matthieu@free.fr>
>
> --- 1/linux/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/dvb_frontend.c 2010-03-27 22:59:50.000000000 +0100
> +++ 2/linux/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/dvb_frontend.c 2010-03-27 23:01:34.000000000 +0100
> @@ -686,7 +686,10 @@
> }
>
> fepriv->thread = NULL;
> - fepriv->exit = 0;
> + if (kthread_should_stop())
> + fepriv->exit = 2;
Your patch makes sense for me. However, using a "magic" 2 value for exit will
not be clear enough that this means that the device got removed. The better is
to define something like:
#define DVB_FE_NORMAL_EXIT 1
#define DVB_FE_DEVICE_REMOVED 2
And use either one of the macro values for fepriv->exit. This will be clear for those
that may later need to touch on that code.
> + else
> + fepriv->exit = 0;
> mb();
>
> dvb_frontend_wakeup(fe);
> @@ -1929,6 +1932,8 @@
> int ret;
>
> dprintk ("%s\n", __func__);
> + if (fepriv->exit == 2)
> + return -ENODEV;
>
> if (adapter->mfe_shared) {
> mutex_lock (&adapter->mfe_lock);
> @@ -2021,7 +2026,7 @@
> ret = dvb_generic_release (inode, file);
>
> if (dvbdev->users == -1) {
> - if (fepriv->exit == 1) {
> + if (fepriv->exit) {
> fops_put(file->f_op);
> file->f_op = NULL;
> wake_up(&dvbdev->wait_queue)
--
Cheers,
Mauro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-04 0:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-21 11:31 dvb frontend lockup matthieu castet
2010-03-27 22:04 ` [PATCH] fix " matthieu castet
2010-04-03 19:41 ` matthieu castet
2010-05-04 0:07 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2010-05-05 18:59 ` matthieu castet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100503210726.66a41c01@pedra \
--to=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=castet.matthieu@free.fr \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox