From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:57495 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755386Ab0IFVQe (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Sep 2010 17:16:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 14:09:05 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Michal Nazarewicz Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Daniel Walker , FUJITA Tomonori , Hans Verkuil , Jonathan Corbet , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Kyungmin Park , Marek Szyprowski , Mel Gorman , Minchan Kim , Pawel Osciak , Peter Zijlstra , Russell King , Zach Pfeffer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFCv5 0/9] CMA + VCMM integration Message-ID: <20100906210905.GB5863@kroah.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-ID: Sender: Mauro Carvalho Chehab On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 08:33:50AM +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This patchset introduces a draft of a redesign of Zach Pfeffer's > VCMM. What is a VCMM? What is a CMA? > Not all of the functionality of the original VCMM has been > ported into this patchset. This is mostly meant as RFC. Moreover, > the code for VCMM implementation in this RFC has not been tested. If you haven't even tested it, why should we review it? thanks, greg k-h