From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Andy Walls <awalls@md.metrocast.net>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
stoth@kernellabs.com
Subject: Re: cx23885-input.c does in fact use a workqueue....
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:33:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110214043355.GA28090@core.coreip.homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297647322.19186.61.camel@localhost>
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 08:35:22PM -0500, Andy Walls wrote:
> Tejun,
>
> I just noticed this commit:
>
> commit 8c71778cbf2c8beaefaa2dee5478aa0622d96682
> Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Date: Fri Dec 24 16:14:20 2010 +0100
>
> media/video: don't use flush_scheduled_work()
>
> This patch converts the remaining users of flush_scheduled_work() in
> media/video.
>
> * bttv-input.c and cx23885-input.c don't use workqueue at all. No
> need to flush.
> [...]
>
>
> The cx23885 driver does in fact schedule work for IR input handling:
>
> Here's where it is scheduled for CX23888 chips:
>
> http://git.linuxtv.org/media_tree.git?a=blob;f=drivers/media/video/cx23885/cx23885-ir.c;h=7125247dd25558678c823ee3262675570c9aa630;hb=HEAD#l76
>
> Here's where it is scheduled for CX23885 chips:
>
> http://git.linuxtv.org/media_tree.git?a=blob;f=drivers/media/video/cx23885/cx23885-core.c;h=359882419b7f588b7c698dbcfb6a39ddb1603301;hb=HEAD#l1861
>
>
> The two different chips are handled slightly differently because
>
> a. the CX23888 IR unit is accessable via a PCI register block. The IR
> IRQ can be acknowledged with direct PCI register accesses in an
> interrupt context, and the IR pulse FIFO serviced later in a workqueue
> context.
>
> b. the CX23885 IR unit is accessed over an I2C bus. The CX23885 A/V IRQ
> has to be masked in an interrupt context (with PCI registers accesses).
> Then the CX23885 A/V unit's IR IRQ is ack'ed over I2C in a workqueue
> context and the IR pulse FIFO is also serviced over I2C in a workqueue
> context.
>
>
> So what should be done about the flush_scheduled_work()? I think it
> belongs there.
>
Convert to using threaded irq?
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-14 4:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-14 1:35 cx23885-input.c does in fact use a workqueue Andy Walls
2011-02-14 4:33 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2011-02-14 11:03 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-15 0:54 ` Andy Walls
2011-02-15 9:12 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-15 9:20 ` [PATCH] cx23885: restore flushes of cx23885_dev work items Tejun Heo
2011-02-15 20:00 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110214043355.GA28090@core.coreip.homeip.net \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=awalls@md.metrocast.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stoth@kernellabs.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox