public inbox for linux-media@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
To: Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@gmail.com>
Cc: mchehab@infradead.org, oliver@neukum.org, jwjstone@fastmail.fm,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/16] [media] lmedm04: get rid of on-stack dma buffers
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 22:46:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110315224641.4e088082@schatten.dmk.lab> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1300222483.1910.12.camel@localhost>

On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:54:43 +0000
Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@gmail.com> wrote:

> The patch failed for the following reason.
> 
> On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 09:43 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > usb_control_msg initiates (and waits for completion of) a dma transfer using
> > the supplied buffer. That buffer thus has to be seperately allocated on
> > the heap.
> > 
> > In lib/dma_debug.c the function check_for_stack even warns about it:
> > 	WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:866 check_for_stack
> > 
> > Note: This change is tested to compile only, as I don't have the hardware.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/lmedm04.c |   16 +++++++++++++---
> >  1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/lmedm04.c b/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/lmedm04.c
> > index 0a3e88f..bec5439 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/lmedm04.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/lmedm04.c
> > @@ -314,12 +314,17 @@ static int lme2510_int_read(struct dvb_usb_adapter *adap)
> >  static int lme2510_return_status(struct usb_device *dev)
> >  {
> >  	int ret = 0;
> > -	u8 data[10] = {0};
> > +	u8 *data;
> > +
> > +	data = kzalloc(10, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!data)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> >  
> >  	ret |= usb_control_msg(dev, usb_rcvctrlpipe(dev, 0),
> >  			0x06, 0x80, 0x0302, 0x00, data, 0x0006, 200);
> >  	info("Firmware Status: %x (%x)", ret , data[2]);
> >  
> > +	kfree(data);
> >  	return (ret < 0) ? -ENODEV : data[2];
> 
> data has been killed off when we need the buffer contents.
> changing to the following fixed.
> 
> 	ret = (ret < 0) ? -ENODEV : data[2];
> 
> 	kfree(data);
> 
> 	return ret;

Yes. Thanks. I updated the patch locally. 

> 
> > @@ -603,7 +608,7 @@ static int lme2510_download_firmware(struct usb_device *dev,
> >  					const struct firmware *fw)
> >  {
> >  	int ret = 0;
> > -	u8 data[512] = {0};
> > +	u8 *data;
> >  	u16 j, wlen, len_in, start, end;
> >  	u8 packet_size, dlen, i;
> >  	u8 *fw_data;
> > @@ -611,6 +616,11 @@ static int lme2510_download_firmware(struct usb_device *dev,
> >  	packet_size = 0x31;
> >  	len_in = 1;
> >  
> > +	data = kzalloc(512, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!data) {
> > +		info("FRM Could not start Firmware Download (Buffer allocation failed)");
> 
> Longer than 80 characters, 

I choose to ignore this warning to keep the string on one line (for
grep and co).

> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	info("FRM Starting Firmware Download");
> >  
> > @@ -654,7 +664,7 @@ static int lme2510_download_firmware(struct usb_device *dev,
> >  	else
> >  		info("FRM Firmware Download Completed - Resetting Device");
> >  
> > -
> > +	kfree(data);
> >  	return (ret < 0) ? -ENODEV : 0;
> >  }
> >  
> 
> Otherwise the patch as corrected has been put on test. No initial
> problems have been encountered.
> 
> Regards 
> 
> Malcolm
> 

Thanks. I added a 
Tested-by: Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@gmail.com>,
if that is ok?

Do you know how often/when is the .identify_state callback called during
normal operation? I.e. is this memory allocation/deallocation
in lme2510_return_status happening often and should use a preallocated
buffer?

Regards,
Flo

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-15 21:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-06 11:16 [PATCH] [media] dib0700: get rid of on-stack dma buffers Florian Mickler
2011-03-06 12:06 ` Oliver Neukum
2011-03-06 14:38   ` Florian Mickler
2011-03-06 14:45     ` [PATCH 1/3 v2] " Florian Mickler
2011-03-06 14:45       ` [PATCH 2/3] [media] dib0700: remove unused variable Florian Mickler
2011-03-06 14:45       ` [PATCH 3/3] [media] dib0700: don't ignore errors in driver probe Florian Mickler
2011-03-06 15:06     ` [PATCH] [media] dib0700: get rid of on-stack dma buffers Oliver Neukum
2011-03-06 15:45       ` Florian Mickler
2011-03-06 16:44         ` Oliver Neukum
2011-03-06 17:47           ` [PATCH 1/2 v3] " Florian Mickler
2011-03-06 17:47             ` [PATCH 2/2] [media] dib0700: remove unused variable Florian Mickler
2011-03-06 17:57             ` [PATCH 1/2 v3] [media] dib0700: get rid of on-stack dma buffers Florian Mickler
2011-03-15  8:36               ` Florian Mickler
2011-03-15  8:43                 ` [PATCH 01/16] " Florian Mickler
2011-03-15  8:43                   ` [PATCH 02/16] [media] dib0700: remove unused variable Florian Mickler
2011-03-15  8:43                   ` [PATCH 03/16] [media] a800: get rid of on-stack dma buffers Florian Mickler
2011-03-15  8:43                   ` [PATCH 04/16] [media] vp7045: " Florian Mickler
2011-03-15  8:43                   ` [PATCH 05/16] [media] ec168: get rid of on stack " Florian Mickler
2011-03-18 16:36                     ` Antti Palosaari
2011-03-18 21:33                       ` Florian Mickler
2011-03-15  8:43                   ` [PATCH 06/16] [media] ce6230: get rid of on-stack dma buffer Florian Mickler
2011-03-18 16:36                     ` Antti Palosaari
2011-03-18 21:28                       ` Florian Mickler
2011-03-15  8:43                   ` [PATCH 07/16] [media] friio: get rid of on-stack dma buffers Florian Mickler
2011-03-15  8:43                   ` [PATCH 11/16] [media] lmedm04: correct indentation Florian Mickler
2011-03-15  8:43                   ` [PATCH 12/16] [media] lmedm04: get rid of on-stack dma buffers Florian Mickler
2011-03-15 20:54                     ` Malcolm Priestley
2011-03-15 21:46                       ` Florian Mickler [this message]
2011-03-15 12:02                   ` [PATCH 01/16] [media] dib0700: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-03-15 21:14                     ` Florian Mickler
     [not found]                   ` <1300178655-24832-9-git-send-email-florian@mickler.org>
2011-03-18 16:34                     ` [PATCH 09/16] [media] au6610: get rid of on-stack dma buffer Antti Palosaari
2011-03-18 21:27                       ` Florian Mickler
2011-03-18 21:40                         ` Antti Palosaari
2011-03-15 11:37                 ` [PATCH 1/2 v3] [media] dib0700: get rid of on-stack dma buffers Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2011-03-06 13:49 ` [PATCH] " Jack Stone
2011-03-06 14:00   ` Florian Mickler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110315224641.4e088082@schatten.dmk.lab \
    --to=florian@mickler.org \
    --cc=jwjstone@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
    --cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
    --cc=oliver@neukum.org \
    --cc=tvboxspy@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox