From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com ([95.142.166.194]:43840 "EHLO perceval.ideasonboard.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753041Ab1DEMBo (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Apr 2011 08:01:44 -0400 From: Laurent Pinchart To: "Hans Verkuil" Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/4] V4L: add three new ioctl()s for multi-size videobuffer management Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:02:17 +0200 Cc: "Guennadi Liakhovetski" , "Linux Media Mailing List" , "Mauro Carvalho Chehab" References: <56f5dd2ffa0a55d09a5f391f0fa2e9d0.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <56f5dd2ffa0a55d09a5f391f0fa2e9d0.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201104051402.17836.laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> List-ID: Sender: On Monday 04 April 2011 10:06:47 Hans Verkuil wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Hans Verkuil wrote: > >> On Friday, April 01, 2011 10:13:02 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: [snip] > BTW, REQBUFS and CREATE/DESTROY_BUFS should definitely co-exist. REQBUFS > is compulsory, while CREATE/DESTROY are optional. Drivers must support REQBUFS and should support CREATE/DESTROY, but I think applications should not be allowed to mix calls. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart