From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from denali.acsalaska.net ([209.112.173.242]:54672 "EHLO denali.acsalaska.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754249Ab1I3UxU (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:53:20 -0400 Received: from localhost2.local (66-230-86-166-rb1.fai.dsl.dynamic.acsalaska.net [66.230.86.166]) by denali.acsalaska.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8UKrIE5019338 for ; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:53:18 -0800 (AKDT) (envelope-from rogerx.oss@gmail.com) Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:53:17 -0800 From: Roger Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: dvbscan output Channel Number into final stdout? Message-ID: <20110930205317.GA2287@localhost2.local> References: <20110929224418.GD2824@localhost2.local> <4e856d27.92d1e30a.6587.13f8@mx.google.com> <20110930080609.GD2284@localhost2.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)@canuck.infradead.org Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 12:34:41PM -0500, david.hagood@gmail.com wrote: >Even that won't always save you. In my area, we have 2 distinct signals, >both identifying themselves as "KAKE-DT" on virtual channel 10.1, so even >that isn't guaranteed to be unique. Eh, what fun. Technically, should just output both, the channel_name and channel_num. ie. For my channel 2:1 here (using chicken scratch): -- KATN-DT:497028615:8VSB:49:52:3 ++ KATN-DT:2.1:497028615:8VSB:49:52:3 or ++ 2.1:KATN-DT:497028615:8VSB:49:52:3 -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/