From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:48329 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755465Ab2CBVQy (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2012 16:16:54 -0500 Received: by dajr28 with SMTP id r28so2419314daj.19 for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:16:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:13:00 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Jonathan Nieder Cc: Ben Hutchings , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Torsten Crass , Jarod Wilson , linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.0.y 0/4] Re: lirc_serial spuriously claims assigned port and irq to be in use Message-ID: <20120302211300.GA6008@kroah.com> References: <1321422581.2885.50.camel@deadeye> <20120302034545.GA31860@burratino> <1330662942.8460.229.camel@deadeye> <20120302203913.GA22323@burratino> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120302203913.GA22323@burratino> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:39:13PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 21:45 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > >> Would some of these patches (e.g., at least patches 1, 2, and 5) be > >> appropriate for inclusion in the 3.0.y and 3.2.y stable kernels from > >> kernel.org? > > > > Assuming they haven't caused any regressions, I think everything except > > 9b98d6067971 (4/5) would be appropriate. > > Great. Here are the aforementioned patches rebased against 3.0.y, in > the hope that some interested person can confirm they still work. The > only backporting needed was to adjust to the lack of > drivers/staging/lirc -> drivers/staging/media/lirc renaming. I'll look at these, but please, in the future, send all stable patches to stable@vger.kernel.org as there are other stable trees that people maintain and they watch that list... thanks, greg k-h