From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-yw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]:40133 "EHLO mail-yw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755173Ab2CHSex (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2012 13:34:53 -0500 Received: by yhmm54 with SMTP id m54so419953yhm.19 for ; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 10:34:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 10:34:47 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Jonathan Nieder Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Torsten Crass , Jarod Wilson , Ben Hutchings , linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.0.y 0/4] Re: lirc_serial spuriously claims assigned port and irq to be in use Message-ID: <20120308183447.GA25235@kroah.com> References: <1321422581.2885.50.camel@deadeye> <20120302034545.GA31860@burratino> <1330662942.8460.229.camel@deadeye> <20120302203913.GA22323@burratino> <20120307200407.GB26451@kroah.com> <20120307201709.GD2008@burratino> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120307201709.GD2008@burratino> Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 02:17:09PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:39:13PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > >> Ben Hutchings wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 21:45 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > >>>> Would some of these patches (e.g., at least patches 1, 2, and 5) be > >>>> appropriate for inclusion in the 3.0.y and 3.2.y stable kernels from > >>>> kernel.org? > >>> > >>> Assuming they haven't caused any regressions, I think everything except > >>> 9b98d6067971 (4/5) would be appropriate. > >> > >> Great. Here are the aforementioned patches rebased against 3.0.y, > [...] > > So they should also go to 3.2-stable, right? > > Yes. Thanks, all now queued up. greg k-h