From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from tex.lwn.net ([70.33.254.29]:34730 "EHLO vena.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753187Ab2IMRor (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:44:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:45:31 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Federico Vaga Cc: Marek Szyprowski , 'Mauro Carvalho Chehab' , 'Pawel Osciak' , 'Hans Verkuil' , 'Giancarlo Asnaghi' , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] videobuf2-dma-streaming: new videobuf2 memory allocator Message-ID: <20120913114531.4560b3f0@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <2107949.TNqhOsq2WF@harkonnen> References: <1347544368-30583-1-git-send-email-federico.vaga@gmail.com> <1347544368-30583-3-git-send-email-federico.vaga@gmail.com> <002e01cd91b9$2110d160$63327420$%szyprowski@samsung.com> <2107949.TNqhOsq2WF@harkonnen> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 17:46:32 +0200 Federico Vaga wrote: > > A few words explaining why this memory handling module is required or > > beneficial will definitely improve the commit :) > > ok, I will write some lines In general, all of these patches need *much* better changelogs (i.e. they need changelogs). What are you doing, and *why* are you doing it? The future will want to know. I'm going to try to look at the actual code, but time isn't something I have a lot of, still... Thanks, jon